- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.088070v1
179/4/2147 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Casellas, J.
- Articles by Medrano, J. F.
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Casellas, J.
- Articles by Medrano, J. F.
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.088070
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2008.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice
Joaquim Casellas 1 and Juan F. Medrano 2*
1 IRTA-Lleida
2 University of California Davis
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jfmedrano{at}ucdavis.edu.
Submitted on February 14, 2008
Revised on March 23, 2008
Accepted on 30 May 2008
The mutational input of genetic variance per generation (
2m) is the lower limit of the genetic variability in inbred strains of mice, although greater values could be expected due to the accumulation of new mutations in successive generations. A mixed model analysis using Bayesian methods was applied to estimate
2m and the across-generation accumulated genetic variability on litter size in 46 generations of a C57BL/6J inbred strain. This allowed for a separate inference on
2m and on the additive genetic variance in the base population (
2a). The additive genetic variance in the base generation was 0.151 and quickly decreased to almost null estimates in generation 10. On the other hand,
2m reached a moderate estimate (0.035) and the within-generation mutational variance increased up to generation 14, showing an oscillating draw between 0.102 and 0.234 during the remaining generations. This pattern agreed with
2a in the base population and suggested the existence of a continuous uploading of genetic variability for litter size (h2 = 0.045 ). Relevant genetic drift was not detected in this population. In conclusion, our approach allowed for a separate estimation of
2a and
2m within the mixed model framework, and the heritability obtained highlighted the significant and continuous influence of new genetic variability impacting the genetic stability of inbred strains.
Key Words: C57BL/6J, genetic stability, genetic variability, inbred strain, mutation