- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.067355v1
176/1/351 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Witherspoon, D. J
- Articles by Jorde, L. B
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Witherspoon, D. J
- Articles by Jorde, L. B
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.067355
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2007.
REGULAR RESEARCH PAPERS |
Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations
David J Witherspoon 1, Stephen Wooding 2, Alan R Rogers 1, Elizabeth E Marchani 1, W Scott Watkins 1, Mark A Batzer 3 and Lynn B Jorde 1*
1 University of Utah
2 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
3 Louisiana State University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lbj{at}genetics.utah.edu.
Submitted on October 25, 2006
Revised on January 10, 2007
Accepted on 5 February 2007
The proportion of human genetic variation due to differences between populations is modest, and individuals from different populations can be genetically more similar than individuals from the same population. Yet sufficient genetic data can permit accurate classification of individuals into populations. To resolve this apparent conflict, we analyzed the question "How often is a pair of random individuals from two different populations genetically more similar than a pair of individuals randomly selected from any single population"; We compared this frequency (w) with error rates for classification methods, using data sets that vary in number of loci, diversity of populations, and polymorphism ascertainment strategies. Classification methods achieve higher discriminatory power than the individual-based measure, w, because of their use of aggregate properties of populations. The number of loci analyzed is the most critical variable: with one hundred polymorphisms, accurate classification is possible, but w remains sizable, even when using populations as distinct as sub-Saharan Africans and Europeans. Phenotypes controlled by a dozen or fewer loci can be expected to show substantial overlap between human populations. This provides empirical justification for caution when using population labels in biomedical settings, with broad implications for personalized medicine, pharmacogenetics, and the meaning of race.
Key Words: classification, genetic polymorphism, human population, race, variation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. M. Weiss and J. C. Long Non-Darwinian estimation: My ancestors, my genes' ancestors Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 703 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Xing, W. S. Watkins, D. J. Witherspoon, Y. Zhang, S. L. Guthery, R. Thara, B. J. Mowry, K. Bulayeva, R. B. Weiss, and L. B. Jorde Fine-scaled human genetic structure revealed by SNP microarrays Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 815 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. L. Bonham JD and E. M. Ramos PhD MPH Unravelling the contributions of social, environmental and genetic factors to health differences Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 23, 2008; 179(7): 629 - 630. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|