- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Rosenbluth, R. E.
- Articles by Baillie, D. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Rosenbluth, R. E.
- Articles by Baillie, D. L.
THE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF A RECIPROCAL TRANSLOCATION, eT1(III; V), IN CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS
Raja E. Rosenbluth 1 and David L. Baillie 1
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A156
The Caenorhabditis elegans mutation e873, which results in a recessive uncoordinated phenotype (formerly named Unc-72) and which had been isolated after 32P treatment (Brenner 1974), has now been found to act as a crossover suppressor and to be associated with a translocation between linkage groups (LG's) III and V. The translocation has been named, eT1(III; V); eT1 acts as a dominant crossover suppressor for both the right half of LGIII and the left half of LGV, providing a balancer for a total of 39 map units. The uncoordinated e873 phenotype has been shown to be a consequence of an inactive unc-36III gene. It was possible to demonstrate that, in translocation heterozygotes, eT1 chromosomes marked with either sma-3 or dpy-11 segregate from normal LGIII, while those marked with bli-5, sma-2 or unc-42 segregate from normal LGV. Since bli-5 and sma-2 are normally on LGIII, and dpy-11 is normally on LGV, it is concluded that: (a) eT1 is a reciprocal translocation; (b) there is a breakpoint between sma-3 and sma-2 in LGIII (the region containing unc-36) and one between dpy-11 and unc-42 in LGV; (c) there is no dominant centromere between sma-2 and bli-5 on LGIII, since in eT1 these genes are not linked to a LGIII centromere. Similarly, it is highly unlikely that there is a centromere to the left of dpy-11 on LGV. The new gene order in eT1 was determined by measuring recombination rates between markers in eT1 homozygotes. It is concluded that the new order is: dpy-1 sma-3 (break) dpy-11 unc-60, and bli-5 sma-2 (break) unc-42 unc-51.This is the first analysis of a C. elegans translocation with respect to reciprocity, breakpoints and new gene order.
Submitted on May 15, 1981Revised on September 3, 1981
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. Ceol, F. Stegmeier, M. M. Harrison, and H. R. Horvitz Identification and Classification of Genes That Act Antagonistically to let-60 Ras Signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans Vulval Development Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 709 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hammarlund, M. W. Davis, H. Nguyen, D. Dayton, and E. M. Jorgensen Heterozygous Insertions Alter Crossover Distribution but Allow Crossover Interference in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1047 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Maciejowski, J. H. Ahn, P. G. Cipriani, D. J. Killian, A. L. Chaudhary, J. I. Lee, R. Voutev, R. C. Johnsen, D. L. Baillie, K. C. Gunsalus, et al. Autosomal Genes of Autosomal/X-Linked Duplicated Gene Pairs and Germ-Line Proliferation in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 1997 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Thomas, C. J. Ceol, H. T. Schwartz, and H. R. Horvitz New Genes That Interact With lin-35 Rb to Negatively Regulate the let-60 ras Pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, May 1, 2003; 164(1): 135 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S.-R. Pepper, D. J. Killian, and E. J. A. Hubbard Genetic Analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans glp-1 Mutants Suggests Receptor Interaction or Competition Genetics, January 1, 2003; 163(1): 115 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hodgkin Exploring the Envelope: Systematic Alteration in the Sex-Determination System of the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, October 1, 2002; 162(2): 767 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Rocheleau, R. M. Howard, A. P. Goldman, M. L. Volk, L. J. Girard, and M. V. Sundaram A lin-45 raf Enhancer Screen Identifies eor-1, eor-2 and Unusual Alleles of Ras Pathway Genes in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 121 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Chen and M. Han Role of C. elegans lin-40 MTA in vulval fate specification and morphogenesis Development, December 1, 2001; 128(23): 4911 - 4921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Kwon and J. Lee Biological significance of a universally conserved transcription mediator in metazoan developmental signaling pathways Development, August 15, 2001; 128(16): 3095 - 3104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Praitis, E. Casey, D. Collar, and J. Austin Creation of Low-Copy Integrated Transgenic Lines in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1217 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K Okada, T Obinata, and H Abe XAIP1: a Xenopus homologue of yeast actin interacting protein 1 (AIP1), which induces disassembly of actin filaments cooperatively with ADF/cofilin family proteins J. Cell Sci., January 5, 1999; 112(10): 1553 - 1565. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pilgrim CeRep25B Forms Chromosome-Specific Minisatellite Arrays in Caenorhabditis elegans Genome Res., November 1, 1998; 8(11): 1192 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Adames, J. Gawne, C. Wicky, F. Müller, and A. M. Rose Mapping a Telomere Using the Translocation eT1(III;V) in Caenorhabditis elegans Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1059 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K Fitzgerald and I Greenwald Interchangeability of Caenorhabditis elegans DSL proteins and intrinsic signalling activity of their extracellular domains in vivo Development, January 12, 1995; 121(12): 4275 - 4282. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Beanan and S Strome Characterization of a germ-line proliferation mutation in C. elegans Development, January 11, 1992; 116(3): 755 - 766. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



