GENETIC VARIABILITY MAINTAINED BY MUTATION AND OVERDOMINANT SELECTION IN FINITE POPULATIONS

1 Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, The University of Texas at Houston, Texas 77025

Mathematical properties of the overdominance model with mutation and random genetic drift are studied by using the method of stochastic differential equations (Itô and McKean 1974). It is shown that overdominant selection is very powerful in increasing the mean heterozygosity as compared with neutral mutations, and if 2Ns (N = effective population size; s = selective disadvantage for homozygotes) is larger than 10, a very low mutation rate is sufficient to explain the observed level of allozyme polymorphism. The distribution of heterozygosity for overdominant genes is considerably different from that of neutral mutations, and if the ratio of selection coefficient (s) to mutation rate (nu) is large and the mean heterozygosity (h) is lower than 0.2, single-locus heterozygosity is either approximately 0 or 0.5. If h increases further, however, heterozygosity shows a multiple-peak distribution. Reflecting this type of distribution, the relationship between the mean and variance of heterozygosity is considerably different from that for neutral genes. When s/v is large, the proportion of polymorphic loci increases approximately linearly with mean heterozygosity. The distribution of allele frequencies is also drastically different from that of neutral genes, and generally shows a peak at the intermediate gene frequency. Implications of these results on the maintenance of allozyme polymorphism are discussed.

Submitted on September 15, 1980
Revised on February 11, 1981




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. J. Stoffels and H. G. Spencer
An Asymmetric Model of Heterozygote Advantage at Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes: Degenerate Pathogen Recognition and Intersection Advantage
Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1473 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Nei
Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2318 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Aguilar, G. Roemer, S. Debenham, M. Binns, D. Garcelon, and R. K. Wayne
High MHC diversity maintained by balancing selection in an otherwise genetically monomorphic mammal
PNAS, March 9, 2004; 101(10): 3490 - 3494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Takebayashi, P. B. Brewer, E. Newbigin, and M. K. Uyenoyama
Patterns of Variation Within Self-Incompatibility Loci
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2003; 20(11): 1778 - 1794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W.-L. Wu, B. A. Schaal, C.-Y. Hwang, M.-D. Hwang, Y.-C. Chiang, and T.-Y. Chiang
Characterization and adaptive evolution of {alpha}-tubulin genes in the Miscanthus sinensis complex (Poaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2003; 90(10): 1513 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Ohashi and K. Tokunaga
Sojourn Times and Substitution Rate at Overdominant and Linked Neutral Loci
Genetics, June 1, 2000; 155(2): 921 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. H. Schierup, X. Vekemans, and F. B. Christiansen
Allelic Genealogies in Sporophytic Self-Incompatibility Systems in Plants
Genetics, November 1, 1998; 150(3): 1187 - 1198.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. H. Schierup
The Number of Self-Incompatibility Alleles in a Finite, Subdivided Population
Genetics, June 1, 1998; 149(2): 1153 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]