- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Brittnacher, J. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Brittnacher, J. G.
GENETIC VARIATION AND GENETIC LOAD DUE TO THE MALE REPRODUCTIVE COMPONENT OF FITNESS IN DROSOPHILA
John G. Brittnacher 1
1 Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616
The genetic variation and genetic load due to virility, the male reproductive component of fitness, was measured in Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura using males homozygous and heterozygous for the second chromosome of each species. Virility was determined in a female-choice, male mating competition experiment where both mating propensity and fertility were taken into account.The mean virility of the homozygous D. melanogaster males relative to the heterozygous males was 0.50; the relative mean virility of the quasinormal homozygotes was 0.56. The mean virility of the homozygous D. pseudoobscura males relative to the heterozygous males was 0.70; the relative mean virility of the nonsterile homozygotes was 0.72, and of the quasinormal homozygotes, 0.68.Depending on the species and chromosome sampled, fertile homozygous males had a mean virility 15 to 50% lower than the mean viability of individuals homozygous for a chromosome with quasinormal viability. The genetic load due to virility was also greater than that due to the female reproductive component. This higher level of hidden genetic variation (or genetic load) indicates that the results of Prout (1971a, b) and Bundgaard and Christiansen (1972), where the virility component of fitness dominated the dynamics of an artificial polymorphism, may be more general and that virility may dominate the dynamics of natural polymorphisms as well.
Submitted on April 4, 1980Revised on January 5, 1981
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. B. Huey, G. W. Gilchrist, K. Ward, L. Maves, D. Pepin, and D. Houle Mutation Accumulation, Performance, Fitness Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 43(3): 387 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zurovcova and W. F. Eanes Lack of Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Y-Linked Sperm Flagellar Dynein Gene Dhc-Yh3 of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans Genetics, December 1, 1999; 153(4): 1709 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fry, S. L. Heinsohn, and T. F. C. Mackay Heterosis for Viability, Fecundity, and Male Fertility in Drosophila melanogaster : Comparison of Mutational and Standing Variation Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1171 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, A. Hoang, C. E. Hill, P. Beerli, and J. G. Kingsolver Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild PNAS, July 31, 2001; 98(16): 9157 - 9160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


