THE EVOLUTION OF MULTIPLE MATING BEHAVIOR BY HONEY BEE QUEENS (APIS MELLIFERA L.)

Robert E. Page Jr. ¹

¹ Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

A model is presented showing that natural selection operating at the individual level can adequately explain the evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens. Group selection need not be invoked. The fitness of a given female genotype is a function of the number of sex alleles in the population, the number of matings by an individual female and the specific parameters that determine the relationship of brood viability to individual fitness. Even though the exact relationship is not known, it is almost certainly not linear. A nonlinear relationship between worker brood viability and fitness and a significant genetic load associated with the sex-determination system in honey bees are the essential components of this model.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K Trontti, N Thurin, L Sundstrom, and S Aron Mating for convenience or genetic diversity? Mating patterns in the polygynous ant Plagiolepis pygmaea Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 298 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Jones, M. R. Myerscough, S. Graham, and B. P. Oldroyd Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability Science, July 16, 2004; 305(5682): 402 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Cowan and J. K. Stahlhut Functionally reproductive diploid and haploid males in an inbreeding hymenopteran with complementary sex determination PNAS, July 13, 2004; 101(28): 10374 - 10379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Cole and D. C. Wiernasz The Selective Advantage of Low Relatedness Science, August 6, 1999; 285(5429): 891 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. J. Hosken and W. U. Blanckenhorn Female multiple mating, inbreeding avoidance, and fitness: it is not only the magnitude of costs and benefits that counts Behav. Ecol., July 1, 1999; 10(4): 462 - 464. [Full Text] [PDF]