- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Templeton, A. R.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Templeton, A. R.
THE THEORY OF SPECIATION VIA THE FOUNDER PRINCIPLE
Alan R. Templeton 1
1 Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. 63130
The founder principle has been used to explain many instances of rapid speciation. Advances from theoretical population genetics are incorporated into Mayr's original founder-effect genetic-revolution model to yield a newer model called the genetic transilience. The basic theoretical edifice lies upon the fact that founder event can sometimes lead to an accumulation of inbreeding and an induction of gametic disequilibrium. This, in turn, causes alleles to be selected more for their homozygous fitness effects and for their effects on a more stable genetic background. Selection occurring in multi-locus systems controlling integrated developmental, physiological, behavioral, etc., traits is particularly sensitive to these founder effects. If sufficient genetic variability exists in the founder population, such multilocus genetic systems can respond to drift and the altered selective forces by undergoing a rapid shift to a new adaptive peak known as the genetic transilience. A genetic transilience is, therefore, most likely to occur when the founder event causes a rapid accumulation of inbreeding without a severe reduction in genetic variability. The implications of this model are then examined for three aspects of the founder-effect genetic-transilience model: the attributes of the ancestral population, the nature of the sampling process used to generate the founders and the attributes of the founder population. The model is used to explain several features of the evolution of the Hawaiian Drosophila, and experimental designs are outlined to test the major predictions of the theory. Hence, this theory of speciation can be tested in the laboratory, using systems and techniques that already exista rare attribute of most models of speciation.
Submitted on June 6, 1979Revised on November 2, 1979
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Nakamura Possible Transmission Route for Common Wheat to the Far East in Asia Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 1117 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zhou, K. Zeng, W. Wu, X. Chen, Z. Yang, S. Shi, and C.-I Wu Population Genetics of Speciation in Nonmodel Organisms: I. Ancestral Polymorphism in Mangroves Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2746 - 2754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Exadactylos, M. J. Rigby, A. J. Geffen, and J. P. Thorpe Conservation aspects of natural populations and captive-bred stocks of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and Dover sole (Solea solea) using estimates of genetic diversity ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 4, 2007; (2007) fsm086v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. van Swinderen and R. J. Greenspan Flexibility in a Gene Network Affecting a Simple Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2151 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. LaJeunesse "Species" Radiations of Symbiotic Dinoflagellates in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Since the Miocene-Pliocene Transition Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 570 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Bradshaw, B. P. Haggerty, and C. M. Holzapfel Epistasis Underlying a Fitness Trait Within a Natural Population of the Pitcher-Plant Mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 485 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Provine Ernst Mayr: Genetics and Speciation Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1041 - 1046. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Clegg, S. M. Degnan, J. Kikkawa, C. Moritz, A. Estoup, and I. P. F. Owens From the Cover: Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird PNAS, June 11, 2002; 99(12): 8127 - 8132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Batista, A. Banares, J. Caujape-Castells, E. Carque, M. Marrero-Gomez, and P. A. Sosa Allozyme diversity in three endemic species of Cistus (Cistaceae) from the Canary Islands: intraspecific and interspecific comparisons and implications for genetic conservation Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2001; 88(9): 1582 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Templeton, R. J. Robertson, J. Brisson, and J. Strasburg Disrupting evolutionary processes: The effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks PNAS, May 8, 2001; 98(10): 5426 - 5432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pomiankowski and Y. Iwasa Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection PNAS, April 28, 1998; 95(9): 5106 - 5111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. van Swinderen, D. R. Shook, R. H. Ebert, V. A. Cherkasova, T. E. Johnson, R. J. S. Reis, and C. M. Crowder Quantitative trait loci controlling halothane sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans PNAS, July 22, 1997; 94(15): 8232 - 8237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A H Paterson Molecular dissection of quantitative traits: progress and prospects. Genome Res., November 1, 1995; 5(4): 321 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. WAKE and A. LARSON Multidimensional Analysis of an Evolving Lineage Science, October 2, 1987; 238(4823): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Giddings, L. V. Giddings, and A. R. Templeton Behavioral Phylogenies and the Direction of Evolution Science, April 22, 1983; 220(4595): 372 - 378. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Rose and W. F. Doolittle Molecular Biological Mechanisms of Speciation Science, April 8, 1983; 220(4593): 157 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. MARKOW Mating Preferences Are Not Predictive of the Direction of Evolution in Experimental Populations of Drosophila Science, September 18, 1981; 213(4514): 1405 - 1407. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||







