- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Stam, P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Stam, P.
INTERFERENCE IN GENETIC CROSSING OVER AND CHROMOSOME MAPPING
P. Stam 1
1 Department of Genetics, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
This paper proposes a general model for interference in genetic crossing over. The model assumes serial occurrence of chiasmata, visualized as a renewal process along the paired (or pairing) chromosomes. This process is described as an underlying Poisson process in which the 1st, n + 1th, 2n + 1th, etc., events are to be interpreted as realized chiasmata. Chromatid interference is described in terms of the probabilities that two successive chiasmata involve two, three or four different chromatids. Several characteristics of this model, e.g., the cytological and genetic mapping function and the density of chiasmata along the chromosomes, are discussed. Some aspects of other interference models are briefly discussed.
Submitted on November 29, 1977Revised on December 8, 1978
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Frisch and A. E. Melchinger Variance of the Parental Genome Contribution to Inbred Lines Derived From Biparental Crosses Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 477 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. de Boer, A. J. J. Dietrich, C. Hoog, P. Stam, and C. Heyting Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2007; 120(5): 731 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Frisch and A. E. Melchinger Marker-Based Prediction of the Parental Genome Contribution to Inbred Lines Derived From Biparental Crosses Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 795 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. de Boer, P. Stam, A. J. J. Dietrich, A. Pastink, and C. Heyting Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9607 - 9612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. W. Stahl, H. M. Foss, L. S. Young, R. H. Borts, M. F. F. Abdullah, and G. P. Copenhaver Does Crossover Interference Count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 35 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. P. Copenhaver, E. A. Housworth, and F. W. Stahl Crossover Interference in Arabidopsis Genetics, April 1, 2002; 160(4): 1631 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Frisch and A. E. Melchinger The Length of the Intact Donor Chromosome Segment Around a Target Gene in Marker-Assisted Backcrossing Genetics, March 1, 2001; 157(3): 1343 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|