- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Baker, B. S.
- Articles by Ripoll, P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Baker, B. S.
- Articles by Ripoll, P.
THE UTILIZATION DURING MITOTIC CELL DIVISION OF LOCI CONTROLLING MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION AND DISJUNCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Bruce S. Baker 1, Adelaide T. C. Carpenter 1, and P. Ripoll 1
1 Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
To inquire whether the loci identified by recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutants in Drosophila are also utilized during mitotic cell division, the effects of 18 meiotic mutants (representing 13 loci) on mitotic chromosome stability have been examined genetically. To do this, meiotic-mutant-bearing flies heterozygous for recessive somatic cell markers were examined for the frequencies and types of spontaneous clones expressing the cell markers. In such flies, marked clones can arise via mitotic recombination, mutation, chromosome breakage, nondisjunction or chromosome loss, and clones from these different origins can be distinguished. In addition, meiotic mutants at nine loci have been examined for their effects on sensitivity to killing by UV and X rays.Mutants at six of the seven recombination-defective loci examined (mei-9, mei-41, c(3)G, mei-W68, mei-S282, mei-352, mei-218) cause mitotic chromosome instability in both sexes, whereas mutants at one locus (mei-218) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability. Thus many of the loci utilized during meiotic recombination also function in the chromosomal economy of mitotic cells.The chromosome instability produced by mei-41 alleles is the consequence of chromosome breakage, that of mei-9 alleles is primarily due to chromosome breakage and, to a lesser extent, to an elevated frequency of mitotic recombination, whereas no predominant mechanism responsible for the instability caused by c(3)G alleles is discernible. Since these three loci are defective in their responses to mutagen damage, their effects on chromosome stability in nonmutagenized cells are interpreted as resulting from an inability to repair spontaneous lesions. Both mei-W68 and mei-S282 increase mitotic recombination (and in mei-W68, to a lesser extent, chromosome loss) in the abdomen but not the wing. In the abdomen, the primary effect on chromosome stability occurs during the larval period when the abdominal histoblasts are in a nondividing (G2) state.Mitotic recombination is at or above control levels in the presence of each of the recombination-defective meiotic mutants examined, suggesting that meiotic and mitotic recombination are under separate genetic control in Drosophila.Of the six mutants examined that are defective in processes required for regular meiotic chromosome segregation, four (l(1)TW-6cs, cand, mei-S332, ord) affect mitotic chromosome behavior. At semi-restrictive temperatures, the cold sensitive lethal l(1)TW-6cs causes very frequent somatic spots, a substantial proportion of which are attributable to nondisjunction or loss. Thus, this locus specifies a function essential for chromosome segregation at mitosis as well as at the first meiotic division in females. The patterns of mitotic effects caused by cand, mei-S332, and ord suggest that they may be leaky alleles at essential loci that specify functions common to meiosis and mitosis. Mutants at the two remaining loci (nod, pal) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability.
Submitted on January 18, 1978Revised on April 18, 1978
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Lake, K. Teeter, S. L. Page, R. Nielsen, and R. S. Hawley A Genetic Analysis of the Drosophila mcm5 Gene Defines a Domain Specifically Required for Meiotic Recombination Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2151 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. LaRocque, D. L. Dougherty, S. K. Hussain, and J. Sekelsky Reducing DNA Polymerase {alpha} in the Absence of Drosophila ATR Leads to P53-Dependent Apoptosis and Developmental Defects Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1441 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. McEwen and M. Peifer Puckered, a Drosophila MAPK phosphatase, ensures cell viability by antagonizing JNK-induced apoptosis Development, September 1, 2005; 132(17): 3935 - 3946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Yildiz, H. Kearney, B. C. Kramer, and J. J. Sekelsky Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila DNA Repair and Recombination Gene mei-9 Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Symphorien and R. C. Woodruff Effect of DNA Repair on Aging of Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster: I. mei-41 Locus J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2003; 58(9): B782 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sogame, M. Kim, and J. M. Abrams Drosophila p53 preserves genomic stability by regulating cell death PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4696 - 4701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. C. Carpenter Normal Synaptonemal Complex and Abnormal Recombination Nodules in Two Alleles of the Drosophila Meiotic Mutant mei-W68 Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1337 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Barbosa, R. R. Yamamoto, D. S. Henderson, and D. M. Glover Mutation of a Drosophila gamma tubulin ring complex subunit encoded by discs degenerate-4 differentially disrupts centrosomal protein localization Genes & Dev., December 15, 2000; 14(24): 3126 - 3139. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Sargent, J. L. Meservy, B. D. Perkins, A. E. Kilburn, Z. Intody, G. M. Adair, R. S. Nairn, and J. H. Wilson Role of the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 in formation of recombination-dependent rearrangements in mammalian cells Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2000; 28(19): 3771 - 3778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Liu, J. K. Jang, J. Graham, K. Nycz, and K. S. McKim Two Genes Required for Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Are Expressed From a Dicistronic Message Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1735 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Brodsky, J. J. Sekelsky, G. Tsang, R. S. Hawley, and G. M. Rubin mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development Genes & Dev., March 15, 2000; 14(6): 666 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kasravi, M. F. Walter, S. Brand, J. M. Mason, and H. Biessmann Molecular Cloning and Tissue-Specific Expression of the mutator2 Gene (mu2) in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, July 1, 1999; 152(3): 1025 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Sekelsky, K. S. McKim, L. Messina, R. L. French, W. D. Hurley, T. Arbel, G. M. Chin, B. Deneen, S. J. Force, K. L. Hari, et al. Identification of Novel Drosophila Meiotic Genes Recovered in a P-Element Screen Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 529 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. McKim and A. Hayashi-Hagihara mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved Genes & Dev., September 15, 1998; 12(18): 2932 - 2942. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Beumer, S. Pimpinelli, and K. G. Golic Induced Chromosomal Exchange Directs the Segregation of Recombinant Chromatids in Mitosis of Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 173 - 188. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Sekelsky, K. C. Burtis, and R. S. Hawley Damage Control: The Pleiotropy of DNA Repair Genes in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1587 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Sargent, R. L. Rolig, A. E. Kilburn, G. M. Adair, J. H. Wilson, and R. S. Nairn Recombination-dependent deletion formation in mammalian cells deficient in the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 PNAS, November 25, 1997; 94(24): 13122 - 13127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R S Hawley and S H Friend Strange bedfellows in even stranger places: the role of ATM in meiotic cells, lymphocytes, tumors, and its functional links to p53. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1996; 10(19): 2383 - 2388. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P K Geyer and V G Corces DNA position-specific repression of transcription by a Drosophila zinc finger protein. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1992; 6(10): 1865 - 1873. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Gatti and B S Baker Genes controlling essential cell-cycle functions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes & Dev., April 1, 1989; 3(4): 438 - 453. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Gatti, D. Smith, and B. Baker A gene controlling condensation of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster Science, July 1, 1983; 221(4605): 83 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Merino, W. J. Cummings, S. N. Acharya, and M. E. Zolan Replication-dependent early meiotic requirement for Spo11 and Rad50 PNAS, September 12, 2000; 97(19): 10477 - 10482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Manheim, J. K. Jang, D. Dominic, and K. S. McKim Cytoplasmic Localization and Evolutionary Conservation of MEI-218, a Protein Required for Meiotic Crossing-over in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2002; 13(1): 84 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







