THE UTILIZATION DURING MITOTIC CELL DIVISION OF LOCI CONTROLLING MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION AND DISJUNCTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

1 Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093

To inquire whether the loci identified by recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutants in Drosophila are also utilized during mitotic cell division, the effects of 18 meiotic mutants (representing 13 loci) on mitotic chromosome stability have been examined genetically. To do this, meiotic-mutant-bearing flies heterozygous for recessive somatic cell markers were examined for the frequencies and types of spontaneous clones expressing the cell markers. In such flies, marked clones can arise via mitotic recombination, mutation, chromosome breakage, nondisjunction or chromosome loss, and clones from these different origins can be distinguished. In addition, meiotic mutants at nine loci have been examined for their effects on sensitivity to killing by UV and X rays.—Mutants at six of the seven recombination-defective loci examined (mei-9, mei-41, c(3)G, mei-W68, mei-S282, mei-352, mei-218) cause mitotic chromosome instability in both sexes, whereas mutants at one locus (mei-218) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability. Thus many of the loci utilized during meiotic recombination also function in the chromosomal economy of mitotic cells.—The chromosome instability produced by mei-41 alleles is the consequence of chromosome breakage, that of mei-9 alleles is primarily due to chromosome breakage and, to a lesser extent, to an elevated frequency of mitotic recombination, whereas no predominant mechanism responsible for the instability caused by c(3)G alleles is discernible. Since these three loci are defective in their responses to mutagen damage, their effects on chromosome stability in nonmutagenized cells are interpreted as resulting from an inability to repair spontaneous lesions. Both mei-W68 and mei-S282 increase mitotic recombination (and in mei-W68, to a lesser extent, chromosome loss) in the abdomen but not the wing. In the abdomen, the primary effect on chromosome stability occurs during the larval period when the abdominal histoblasts are in a nondividing (G2) state.—Mitotic recombination is at or above control levels in the presence of each of the recombination-defective meiotic mutants examined, suggesting that meiotic and mitotic recombination are under separate genetic control in Drosophila.—Of the six mutants examined that are defective in processes required for regular meiotic chromosome segregation, four (l(1)TW-6cs, cand, mei-S332, ord) affect mitotic chromosome behavior. At semi-restrictive temperatures, the cold sensitive lethal l(1)TW-6cs causes very frequent somatic spots, a substantial proportion of which are attributable to nondisjunction or loss. Thus, this locus specifies a function essential for chromosome segregation at mitosis as well as at the first meiotic division in females. The patterns of mitotic effects caused by cand, mei-S332, and ord suggest that they may be leaky alleles at essential loci that specify functions common to meiosis and mitosis. Mutants at the two remaining loci (nod, pal) do not affect mitotic chromosome stability.

Submitted on January 18, 1978
Revised on April 18, 1978




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. M. Lake, K. Teeter, S. L. Page, R. Nielsen, and R. S. Hawley
A Genetic Analysis of the Drosophila mcm5 Gene Defines a Domain Specifically Required for Meiotic Recombination
Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2151 - 2163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. R. LaRocque, D. L. Dougherty, S. K. Hussain, and J. Sekelsky
Reducing DNA Polymerase {alpha} in the Absence of Drosophila ATR Leads to P53-Dependent Apoptosis and Developmental Defects
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1441 - 1451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
D. G. McEwen and M. Peifer
Puckered, a Drosophila MAPK phosphatase, ensures cell viability by antagonizing JNK-induced apoptosis
Development, September 1, 2005; 132(17): 3935 - 3946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
O. Yildiz, H. Kearney, B. C. Kramer, and J. J. Sekelsky
Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila DNA Repair and Recombination Gene mei-9
Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 263 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
S. Symphorien and R. C. Woodruff
Effect of DNA Repair on Aging of Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster: I. mei-41 Locus
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2003; 58(9): B782 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Sogame, M. Kim, and J. M. Abrams
Drosophila p53 preserves genomic stability by regulating cell death
PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4696 - 4701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. T. C. Carpenter
Normal Synaptonemal Complex and Abnormal Recombination Nodules in Two Alleles of the Drosophila Meiotic Mutant mei-W68
Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1337 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
V. Barbosa, R. R. Yamamoto, D. S. Henderson, and D. M. Glover
Mutation of a Drosophila gamma tubulin ring complex subunit encoded by discs degenerate-4 differentially disrupts centrosomal protein localization
Genes & Dev., December 15, 2000; 14(24): 3126 - 3139.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. G. Sargent, J. L. Meservy, B. D. Perkins, A. E. Kilburn, Z. Intody, G. M. Adair, R. S. Nairn, and J. H. Wilson
Role of the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 in formation of recombination-dependent rearrangements in mammalian cells
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2000; 28(19): 3771 - 3778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Liu, J. K. Jang, J. Graham, K. Nycz, and K. S. McKim
Two Genes Required for Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Are Expressed From a Dicistronic Message
Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1735 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M. H. Brodsky, J. J. Sekelsky, G. Tsang, R. S. Hawley, and G. M. Rubin
mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development
Genes & Dev., March 15, 2000; 14(6): 666 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Kasravi, M. F. Walter, S. Brand, J. M. Mason, and H. Biessmann
Molecular Cloning and Tissue-Specific Expression of the mutator2 Gene (mu2) in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, July 1, 1999; 152(3): 1025 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. J. Sekelsky, K. S. McKim, L. Messina, R. L. French, W. D. Hurley, T. Arbel, G. M. Chin, B. Deneen, S. J. Force, K. L. Hari, et al.
Identification of Novel Drosophila Meiotic Genes Recovered in a P-Element Screen
Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 529 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
K. S. McKim and A. Hayashi-Hagihara
mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved
Genes & Dev., September 15, 1998; 12(18): 2932 - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. J. Beumer, S. Pimpinelli, and K. G. Golic
Induced Chromosomal Exchange Directs the Segregation of Recombinant Chromatids in Mitosis of Drosophila
Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 173 - 188.
[Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. J. Sekelsky, K. C. Burtis, and R. S. Hawley
Damage Control: The Pleiotropy of DNA Repair Genes in Drosophila melanogaster
Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1587 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. G. Sargent, R. L. Rolig, A. E. Kilburn, G. M. Adair, J. H. Wilson, and R. S. Nairn
Recombination-dependent deletion formation in mammalian cells deficient in the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1
PNAS, November 25, 1997; 94(24): 13122 - 13127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R S Hawley and S H Friend
Strange bedfellows in even stranger places: the role of ATM in meiotic cells, lymphocytes, tumors, and its functional links to p53.
Genes & Dev., October 1, 1996; 10(19): 2383 - 2388.
[PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
P K Geyer and V G Corces
DNA position-specific repression of transcription by a Drosophila zinc finger protein.
Genes & Dev., October 1, 1992; 6(10): 1865 - 1873.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M Gatti and B S Baker
Genes controlling essential cell-cycle functions in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genes & Dev., April 1, 1989; 3(4): 438 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M Gatti, D. Smith, and B. Baker
A gene controlling condensation of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster
Science, July 1, 1983; 221(4605): 83 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. T. Merino, W. J. Cummings, S. N. Acharya, and M. E. Zolan
Replication-dependent early meiotic requirement for Spo11 and Rad50
PNAS, September 12, 2000; 97(19): 10477 - 10482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
E. A. Manheim, J. K. Jang, D. Dominic, and K. S. McKim
Cytoplasmic Localization and Evolutionary Conservation of MEI-218, a Protein Required for Meiotic Crossing-over in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2002; 13(1): 84 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]