- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Hedrick, P. W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Hedrick, P. W.
GENETIC VARIATION IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT. V. SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY IN FINITE POPULATIONS
Philip W. Hedrick 1
1 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence,
Kansas 66045
The spatial model of Levene (1953) was examined in a finite population and compared to a temporal model. The spatial model was much more effective in retaining genetic variation in a finite population. Furthermore, the haploid spatial model was more effective in retaining genetic variation than the analogous diploid absolute dominance model. This is the opposite from that found for the temporal model, where the diploid model was more effective than the haploid. Here is an example where diploidy (sexual reproduction) may be disadvantageous. A model that permitted both spatial and temporal variation to act in concert gave retention of genetic variation in situations where either spatial or temporal variation, separately, did not. The relationship between the amount of heterozygosity and the retardation factor was discussed. An example of how spatial or temporal variation affects the proportion of populations fixed after a certain number of generations was given. It seems that these models have biological analogues, several examples of which are mentioned.
Submitted on October 10, 1977Revised on February 6, 1978