SELECTION DIFFERENTIALS AND SELECTION COEFFICIENTS

1 Department of Zoology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Proof is offered that s sime ig for all forms of selection where fitness is a nondecreasing function of a normally distributed phenotype (called fitness potential); s is selection coefficient, i is standard selection differential, and g is standard differential effect of a locus genotype.

Evidence is presented that the cost of selection does not limit genic polymorphism; that truncation selection is not necessary for high cost-efficiency; and that opposing directions of selection in a heterogeneous environment do not reduce cost-efficiency critically.

Submitted on May 10, 1977
Revised on October 8, 1977




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. A. Gordillo and H. H. Geiger
Alternative Recurrent Selection Strategies Using Doubled Haploid Lines in Hybrid Maize Breeding
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 911 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
G. A. Gordillo and H. H. Geiger
MBP (Version 1.0): A Software Package to Optimize Maize Breeding Procedures Based on Doubled Haploid Lines
J. Hered., March 1, 2008; 99(2): 227 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. C. Phillips and N. A. Johnson
The Population Genetics of Synthetic Lethals
Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 449 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. F. Crow
The high spontaneous mutation rate: Is it a health risk?
PNAS, August 5, 1997; 94(16): 8380 - 8386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. A. Kondrashov and A. S. Kondrashov
Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex
PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12089 - 12092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]