THE TIMING OF UV MUTAGENESIS IN YEAST: A PEDIGREE ANALYSIS OF INDUCED RECESSIVE MUTATION

1 Department of Genetics, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JN, Scotland

The mechanism of UV-induced mutation in eukaryotes was studied in individual yeast cells by a procedure that combined pedigree analysis and tetrad analysis. The technique involved the induction of recessive lethals and semilethals in G1 diploid cells. Induced frequencies were 25 and 61 percent at survival levels of 90 and 77 percent, respectively. No evidence of gross chromosome aberrations was detected. Recessive mutations that affect only one strand or that affect both strands of the DNA molecule are induced much at random among a population of cells, and both types can occur within the same cell. However, the data confirm that two-strand mutations are in the majority after a low level of irradiation. The simplest explanation involves a mechanism whereby most mutations are fixed in both strands prior to the first round of post-irradiation DNA replication. The recessive mutational consequences of irradiation are exhausted at the conclusion of the first post-irradiation cell division, although dominant-lethal sectoring continues at a high level through the second post-irradiation division. It is concluded that pyrimidine dimers that persist to the second round of DNA replication are rare or ineffective.

Submitted on January 24, 1977
Revised on June 29, 1977




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. Hashimoto, M. Ogura, K. Aritomi, H. Hoshida, Y. Nishizawa, and R. Akada
Isolation of Auxotrophic Mutants of Diploid Industrial Yeast Strains after UV Mutagenesis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2005; 71(1): 312 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. G. Paulovich, C. D. Armour, and L. H. Hartwell
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 Genes Are Required for Tolerating Irreparable, Ultraviolet-Induced DNA Damage
Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 75 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text]