- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Sperlich, D.
- Articles by Pentzos-Daponte, A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Sperlich, D.
- Articles by Pentzos-Daponte, A.
GENETIC LOAD AND VIABILITY DISTRIBUTION IN CENTRAL AND MARGINAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA
Diether Sperlich 1, Heide Feuerbach-Mravlag 1, Peter Lange 1, Apostolos Michaelidis 1, and Athena Pentzos-Daponte 1
1 Department of Genetics, University of Tübingen, Germany
Institute of General Biology, University of Vienna, Austria Institute of General
Biology, University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Relative viabilities of individuals homozygous or randomly heterozygous for wild O chromosomes derived from a marginal (Norwegian) and a central (Greek) population of D. subobscura were obtained by means of a newly prepared marker strain. In the central and marginal populations 20.8 and 28.8 percent of all chromosomes proved lethal or semilethal in homozygous condition. Mean viability was higher for +/+ random heterozygotes than for +/+ homozygotes. This remained the case for the marginal, but not for the central populations, after exclusion of the detrimental chromosomes from the calculations. The variances of viabilities were higher for homozygotes than for heterozygotes, but the test crosses with chromosomes from the marginal population had generally higher variances than those with chromosomes from the central population. No correlation was found in either populations between the action of a chromosome in homozygous condition with its action in heterozygous condition. This is interpreted as complete recessiveness of genetic load. The results are discussed in terms of the observed reduction of the inversion polymorphism which is not paralleled by a reduction in enzyme and, as shown here, by reduction in viability variation. It is thought that the heterotic effect of inversions is due to their homeostatic action, which depends less on structural genes than on higher orders of organization due to gene interaction or regulation. Whatever the causes, it is very likely that marginal populations differ from central populations with respect to their genetic system.
Submitted on October 19, 1976Revised on April 11, 1977
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Navarro-Sabate, M. Aguade, and C. Segarra The Relationship Between Allozyme and Chromosomal Polymorphism Inferred From Nucleotide Variation at the Acph-1 Gene Region of Drosophila subobscura Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 871 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rozas, C. Segarra, G. Ribó, and M. Aguadé Molecular Population Genetics of the rp49 Gene Region in Different Chromosomal Inversions of Drosophila subobscura Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 189 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
