- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Ganetzky, B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Ganetzky, B.
ON THE COMPONENTS OF SEGREGATION DISTORTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Barry Ganetzky 1
1 Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington 98195
The segregation distorter (SD) complex is a naturally occurring meiotic drive system with the property that males heterozygous for an SD-bearing chromosome 2 and an SD+-bearing homolog transmit the SD-bearing chromosome almost exclusively. This distorted segregation is the consequence of an induced dysfunction of those sperm that receive the SD+ homolog. From previous studies, two loci have been implicated in this phenomenon: the Sd locus which is required to produce distortion, and the Responder (Rsp) locus that is the site at which Sd acts. There are two allelic alternatives of Rspsensitive (Rspsens) and insensitive (Rspins); a chromosome carrying Rspins is not distorted by SD. In the present study, the function and location of each of these elements was examined by a genetic and cytological characterization of X-ray-induced mutations at each locus. The results indicate the following: (1) the Rsp locus is located in the proximal heterochromatin of 2R; (2) a deletion for the Rsp locus renders a chromosome insensitive to distortion; (3) the Sd locus is located to the left of pr (2-54.5), in the region from 37D2-D7 to 38A6-B2 of the salivary chromosome map; (4) an SD chromosome deleted for Sd loses its ability to distort; (5) there is another important component of the SD system, E(SD), in or near the proximal heterochromatin of 2L, that behaves as a strong enhancer of distortion. The results of these studies allow a reinterpretation of results from earlier analyses of the SD system and serve to limit the possible mechanisms to account for segregation distortion.
Submitted on September 1, 1976Revised on January 31, 1977
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Niehuis, A. K. Judson, and J. Gadau Cytonuclear Genic Incompatibilities Cause Increased Mortality in Male F2 Hybrids of Nasonia giraulti and N. vitripennis Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 413 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marino Profile of Barry Ganetzky PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11515 - 11517. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kusano, C. Staber, and B. Ganetzky Segregation distortion induced by wild-type RanGAP in Drosophila PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 6866 - 6870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Butler, S. Levine, X. Wang, S. Bonyadi, G. Fu, P. Lasko, B. Suter, and R. Doerig Map Position and Expression of the Genes in the 38 Region of Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2001; 158(4): 1597 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ganetzky Yuichiro Hiraizumi and Forty Years of Segregation Distortion Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 1 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M Carmena, J. Abad, A Villasante, and C Gonzalez The Drosophila melanogaster dodecasatellite sequence is closely linked to the centromere and can form connections between sister chromatids during mitosis J. Cell Sci., January 5, 1993; 105(1): 41 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


