- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Coyne, J. A.
- Articles by Singh, R. S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- Articles by Coyne, J. A.
- Articles by Singh, R. S.
CORRIGENDA
J. A. Coyne , A. A. Felton , R. C. Lewontin , and R. S. Singh
In Singh, R. S., R. C. Lewontin and A. A. Felton, 1976 Genetic heterogeneity within electrophoretic alleles of xanthine dehydrogenase in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 84: 609629
In our two papers, we used a statistical test of Warren Ewens to ask whether the distribution of alleles deviated significantly from that expected under the neutral theory. Our conclusion was that the distribution was too uneven as compared with the neutral prediction, but that this was not statistically significant. It has been pointed out to us by Dr. Geoffrey Watterson of Monash University that we used incorrect sample sizes in the computer program for Ewens' test, and that when the correct sample sizes are used, the differences become statistically significant. The correct value of F for D. pseudoobscura is 0.4605 with 126 and 26 degrees of freedom, while for D. persimilis, F is 0.2352 with 189 and 22 degrees of freedom. As pointed out by Singh, Lewontin and Felton, however, the significance cannot be depended upon because some of the unevenness may result from the pooling of separate population samples. In fact, 3 of the 12 populations of D. pseudoobscura are too even and 9 are too uneven, but only one of each type is significant. In D. persimilis all three populations are too uneven and all three are significantly so. Thus, the evidence for deviation from neutral theory is stronger than we had originally supposed, but not yet really convincing.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. Kang, B. Lee, and H.-O. Park Specific Residues of the GDP/GTP Exchange Factor Bud5p Are Involved in Establishment of the Cell Type-specific Budding Pattern in Yeast J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 27980 - 27985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Kozminski, L. Beven, E. Angerman, A. H. Y. Tong, C. Boone, and H.-O. Park Interaction between a Ras and a Rho GTPase Couples Selection of a Growth Site to the Development of Cell Polarity in Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2003; 14(12): 4958 - 4970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lord, M. C. Yang, M. Mischke, and J. Chant Cell Cycle Programs of Gene Expression Control Morphogenetic Protein Localization J. Cell Biol., December 27, 2000; 151(7): 1501 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chen, T. Hiroko, A. Chaudhuri, F. Inose, M. Lord, S. Tanaka, J. Chant, and A. Fujita Multigenerational Cortical Inheritance of the Rax2 Protein in Orienting Polarity and Division in Yeast Science, December 8, 2000; 290(5498): 1975 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Park, A. Sanson, and I. Herskowitz Localization of Bud2p, a GTPase-activating protein necessary for programming cell polarity in yeast to the presumptive bud site Genes & Dev., August 1, 1999; 13(15): 1912 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Park, E. Bi, J. R. Pringle, and I. Herskowitz Two active states of the Ras-related Bud1/Rsr1 protein bind to different effectors to determine yeast cell polarity PNAS, April 29, 1997; 94(9): 4463 - 4468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Kang, A. Sanson, B. Lee, and H.-O. Park A GDP/GTP Exchange Factor Involved in Linking a Spatial Landmark to Cell Polarity Science, May 18, 2001; 292(5520): 1376 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||





