- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Portin, P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Portin, P.
ALLELIC NEGATIVE COMPLEMENTATION AT THE ABRUPTEX LOCUS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Petter Portin 1
1 Department of Genetics, University of Turku, SF-20500, Turku
50, Finland
The mutations of the Abruptex locus in Drosophila melanogaster fall into three categories. There are recessive lethal alleles and viable alleles. The latter can be divided into suppressors and nonsuppressors of Notch mutations. The recessive lethals are lethal in heterozygous combination with Notch. As a rule the recessive lethals are lethal also in heterozygous combination with the viable alleles. Heterozygous combinations of certain viable alleles are also lethal. In such heterozygotes, one heteroallele is a suppressor of Notch and the other is a nonsuppressor. Other heterozygous combinations of viable alleles are viable and have an Abruptex phenotype. The insertion of the wild allele of the Abruptex locus as an extra dose (carried by a duplication) into the chromosomal complement of the fly fully restores the viability of the otherwise lethal heterozygotes if two viable alleles are involved. The extra wild allele also restores the viability of heterozygotes in which a lethal and a suppressor allele are present. If, however, a lethal and a nonsuppressor are involved, the wild allele only partly restores the viability, and the effect of the wild allele is weakest if two lethal alleles are involved. It seems likely that of the viable alleles the suppressors of Notch are hypermorphic and the nonsuppressors are hypomorphic. The lethal alleles share properties of both types, and are possibly antimorphic mutations. It is suggested that the locus is responsible for a single function which, however, consists of two components. The hypermorphic mutations are defects of the one component and the hypomorphic mutations of the other. In heterozygotes their cumulative action leads to decreased viability. The lethal alleles are supposed to be defects of the function as a whole. The function controlled by the locus might be a regulative function.
Submitted on September 3, 1974Revised on February 24, 1975
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Fryxell, M. Soderlund, T. V. Jordan, J. M. Verdi, and C. J. Kubu An Animal Model for the Molecular Genetics of CADASIL Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 6 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kidd, T. Lieber, and M. W. Young Ligand-induced cleavage and regulation of nuclear entry of Notch in Drosophila melanogaster embryos Genes & Dev., December 1, 1998; 12(23): 3728 - 3740. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Go and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas A Genetic Screen for Novel Components of the Notch Signaling Pathway During Drosophila Bristle Development Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 211 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Bloor and N. H. Brown Genetic Analysis of the Drosophila {alpha}PS2 Integrin Subunit Reveals Discrete Adhesive, Morphogenetic and Sarcomeric Functions Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1127 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Go, D. Eastman, and S Artavanis-Tsakonas Cell proliferation control by Notch signaling in Drosophila development Development, January 6, 1998; 125(11): 2031 - 2040. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Huppert, T. Jacobsen, and M. Muskavitch Feedback regulation is central to Delta-Notch signalling required for Drosophila wing vein morphogenesis Development, January 9, 1997; 124(17): 3283 - 3291. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Matsuno, R. Diederich, M. Go, C. Blaumueller, and S Artavanis-Tsakonas Deltex acts as a positive regulator of Notch signaling through interactions with the Notch ankyrin repeats Development, January 8, 1995; 121(8): 2633 - 2644. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Swiatek, C E Lindsell, F F del Amo, G Weinmaster, and T Gridley Notch1 is essential for postimplantation development in mice. Genes & Dev., March 15, 1994; 8(6): 707 - 719. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Diederich, K Matsuno, H Hing, and S Artavanis-Tsakonas Cytosolic interaction between deltex and Notch ankyrin repeats implicates deltex in the Notch signaling pathway Development, January 3, 1994; 120(3): 473 - 481. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Ghysen, C Dambly-Chaudiere, L Y Jan, and Y N Jan Cell interactions and gene interactions in peripheral neurogenesis. Genes & Dev., May 1, 1993; 7(5): 723 - 733. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Heitzler and P Simpson Altered epidermal growth factor-like sequences provide evidence for a role of Notch as a receptor in cell fate decisions Development, January 3, 1993; 117(3): 1113 - 1123. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kooh, R. Fehon, and M. Muskavitch Implications of dynamic patterns of Delta and Notch expression for cellular interactions during Drosophila development Development, January 2, 1993; 117(2): 493 - 507. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Del Amo, D. Smith, P. Swiatek, M Gendron-Maguire, R. Greenspan, A. McMahon, and T Gridley Expression pattern of Motch, a mouse homolog of Drosophila Notch, suggests an important role in early postimplantation mouse development Development, January 7, 1992; 115(3): 737 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Xu, I Rebay, R J Fleming, T N Scottgale, and S Artavanis-Tsakonas The Notch locus and the genetic circuitry involved in early Drosophila neurogenesis. Genes & Dev., March 1, 1990; 4(3): 464 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Kidd, M K Baylies, G P Gasic, and M W Young Structure and distribution of the Notch protein in developing Drosophila. Genes & Dev., August 1, 1989; 3(8): 1113 - 1129. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



