THE EVOLUTION OF SELECTIVELY SIMILAR ELECTRO-PHORETICALLY DETECTABLE ALLELES IN FINITE NATURAL POPULATIONS

1 Institute of Animal Resource Ecology and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, Canada

Most of the models of population genetics are not realistic when applied to data on electrophoretic variants of proteins because the same net charge may result from any of several amino acid combinations. In the absence of realistic models they have, however, been widely used to test competing hypotheses about the origin and maintenance of genetic variation in populations. In this paper I present a general method for determining probability generating functions for electrophoretic state differences. Then I use the method to find allelic state difference distributions for selectively similar electrophoretically detectable alleles in finite natural populations.

Predicted patterns of genetic variation, both within and among species, are in reasonable accord with those found in the Drosophila willistoni group by Ayala et al. (1972) and by Ayala and Tracey (1974).

Submitted on July 1, 1974
Revised on December 12, 1974




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. Zhang and N. A. Rosenberg
On the Genealogy of a Duplicated Microsatellite
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2109 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Xu and Y.-X. Fu
Estimating Effective Population Size or Mutation Rate With Microsatellites
Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 555 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Vigouroux, Y. Matsuoka, and J. Doebley
Directional Evolution for Microsatellite Size in Maize
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1480 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y. Vigouroux, J. S. Jaqueth, Y. Matsuoka, O. S. Smith, W. D. Beavis, J. S. C. Smith, and J. Doebley
Rate and Pattern of Mutation at Microsatellite Loci in Maize
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1251 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Walsh
Estimating the Time to the Most Recent Common Ancestor for the Y chromosome or Mitochondrial DNA for a Pair of Individuals
Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 897 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Graham, J. Curran, and B. S. Weir
Conditional Genotypic Probabilities for Microsatellite Loci
Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1973 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Polanski, M. Kimmel, and R. Chakraborty
Application of a time-dependent coalescence process for inferring the history of population size changes from DNA sequence data
PNAS, May 12, 1998; 95(10): 5456 - 5461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kimmel, R. Chakraborty, J. P. King, M. Bamshad, W. S. Watkins, and L. B. Jorde
Signatures of Population Expansion in Microsatellite Repeat Data
Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1921 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]