- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- A corrigendum has been published
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Wehrhahn, C. F.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Wehrhahn, C. F.
THE EVOLUTION OF SELECTIVELY SIMILAR ELECTRO-PHORETICALLY DETECTABLE ALLELES IN FINITE NATURAL POPULATIONS
C. F. Wehrhahn 1
1 Institute of Animal Resource Ecology and Department of Zoology,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver 8, Canada
Most of the models of population genetics are not realistic when applied to data on electrophoretic variants of proteins because the same net charge may result from any of several amino acid combinations. In the absence of realistic models they have, however, been widely used to test competing hypotheses about the origin and maintenance of genetic variation in populations. In this paper I present a general method for determining probability generating functions for electrophoretic state differences. Then I use the method to find allelic state difference distributions for selectively similar electrophoretically detectable alleles in finite natural populations.
Predicted patterns of genetic variation, both within and among species, are in reasonable accord with those found in the Drosophila willistoni group by Ayala et al. (1972) and by Ayala and Tracey (1974).
Submitted on July 1, 1974Revised on December 12, 1974
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Zhang and N. A. Rosenberg On the Genealogy of a Duplicated Microsatellite Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2109 - 2122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Xu and Y.-X. Fu Estimating Effective Population Size or Mutation Rate With Microsatellites Genetics, January 1, 2004; 166(1): 555 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Vigouroux, Y. Matsuoka, and J. Doebley Directional Evolution for Microsatellite Size in Maize Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2003; 20(9): 1480 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Vigouroux, J. S. Jaqueth, Y. Matsuoka, O. S. Smith, W. D. Beavis, J. S. C. Smith, and J. Doebley Rate and Pattern of Mutation at Microsatellite Loci in Maize Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2002; 19(8): 1251 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Walsh Estimating the Time to the Most Recent Common Ancestor for the Y chromosome or Mitochondrial DNA for a Pair of Individuals Genetics, June 1, 2001; 158(2): 897 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Graham, J. Curran, and B. S. Weir Conditional Genotypic Probabilities for Microsatellite Loci Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1973 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Polanski, M. Kimmel, and R. Chakraborty Application of a time-dependent coalescence process for inferring the history of population size changes from DNA sequence data PNAS, May 12, 1998; 95(10): 5456 - 5461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kimmel, R. Chakraborty, J. P. King, M. Bamshad, W. S. Watkins, and L. B. Jorde Signatures of Population Expansion in Microsatellite Repeat Data Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1921 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


