- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Bohren, B. B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Bohren, B. B.
DESIGNING ARTIFICIAL SELECTION EXPERIMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
B. B. Bohren 1
1 Purdue University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Lafayette,
Indiana 47907
The observed genetic gain (
P) from selection
in a finite population is the possible expected genetic gain E(
G) minus the difference in inbreeding depression effects in the selected
and control lines. The inbreeding depression can be avoided by crossing the
control and selected
and
parents to unrelated mates and summing
the observed gains. The possible expected gain will be reduced by an amount
D from the predicted gain because of the effects of the genetic limit
and random genetic drift, the magnitude of which is a function of effective
population size, N. The expected value of D is zero in unselected
control populations and in the first generation for selected populations.
Therefore, this source of bias can be reduced by increasing N in
the selected populations and can be avoided by selecting for a single generation.
To obtain observed responses which are unbiased estimates of the predicted
response from which to estimate the realized heritability (or regression)
in the zero generation, or to test genetic theory based on infinite population
size, single-generation selection with many replications would be most efficient.
To measure the "total" effect or genetic efficiency of a selection criterion
or method, including the effect of different selection intensities, effective
population sizes, and space requirements, more than one generation of selection
is required to estimate the expected response in breeding values. The efficiency,
in the sense of minimum variance, of estimating the expected breeding values
at any generation t will decline as the number of generations
t increases. The variance of either the estimated mean gain or the regression
of gain on selection differential can be reduced more by increasing the number
of replicates K than by increasing the number of generations
t. Also the general pattern of the response over t can be estimated
if the N's are known. Therefore, two- or not more than three-generation
selection experiments with many replications would be most efficient.
Revised on December 23, 1974