- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Eisen, E. J.
- Articles by Legates, J. E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Eisen, E. J.
- Articles by Legates, J. E.
EFFECTS OF POPULATION SIZE AND SELECTION INTENSITY ON CORRELATED RESPONSES TO SELECTION FOR POSTWEANING GAIN IN MICE
E. J. Eisen 1, J. P. Hanrahan 1, and J. E. Legates 1
1 Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Correlated responses to selection for postweaning gain in mice were studied to determine the influence of population size and selection intensity. Correlated traits measured were three-, six- and eight-week body weights, litter size, twelve-day litter weight, proportion infertile matings and two indexes of reproductive performance. In general, the results agreed with observations made on direct response: correlated responses in the body weight traits and litter size increased as (1) selection intensity increased and (2) effective population size increased. Correlated responses in the body weight traits and litter size were positive in the large population size lines (16 pairs), as expected from the positive genetic correlation between these traits and postweaning gain. However, several negative correlated responses were observed at small population sizes (one and two pairs). Within each level of selection intensity, traits generally associated with fitness tended to decline most in the very small populations (one and two pairs) and in the large populations (16 pairs) for apparently different reasons. The fitness decline at the small effective population sizes was attributable to inbreeding depression. In contrast, it was postulated that the fitness decline at the large effective population size was due to selection moving the population mean for body weight and a trait positively correlated genetically with body weight (i.e., percent body fat) away from an optimum.
Submitted on November 29, 1972