GENETIC ANALYSIS OF SEX CHROMOSOMAL MEIOTIC MUTANTS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Bruce S. Baker ¹ and Adelaide T. C. Carpenter ¹

¹ Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

A total of 209 ethyl methanesulfonate-treated X chromosomes were screened for meiotic mutants that either (1) increased sex or fourth chromosome nondisjunction at either meiotic division in males; (2) allowed recombination in such males; (3) increased nondisjunction of the X chromosome at either meiotic division in females; or (4) caused such females, when mated to males heterozygous for Segregation-Distorter (SD) and a sensitive homolog to alter the strength of meiotic drive in males.—Twenty male-specific meiotic mutants were found. Though the rates of nondisjunction differed, all twenty mutants were qualitatively similar in that (1) they alter the disjunction of the X chromosome from the Y chromosome; (2) among the recovered sex-chromosome exceptional progeny, there is a large excess of those derived from nullo-XY as compared to XY gametes; (3) there is a negative correlation between the frequency of sex-chromosome exceptional progeny and the frequency of males among the regular progeny. In their effects on meiosis these mutants are similar to In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R, which is deleted for the basal heterochromatin. These mutants, however, have normal phenotypes and viabilities when examined as X/0 males, and furthermore, a mapping of two of the mutants places them in the euchromatin of the X chromosome. It is suggested that these mutants are in genes whose products are involved in insuring the proper functioning of the basal pairing sites which are deleted in In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R, and in addition that there is a close connection, perhaps causal, between the disruption of normal X-Y pairing (and, therefore, disjunction) and the occurrence of meiotic drive in the male.—Eleven mutants were found which increased nondisjunction in females. These mutants were characterized as to (1) the division at which they acted; (2) their effect on recombination; (3) their dominance; (4) their effects on disjunction of all four chromosome pairs. Five female mutants caused a nonuniform decrease in recombination, being most pronounced in distal regions, and an increase in first division nondisjunction of all chromosome pairs. Their behavior is consistent with the hypothesis that these mutants are defective in a process which is a precondition for exchange. Two female mutants were allelic and caused a uniform reduction in recombination for all intervals (though to different extents for the two alleles) and an increase in first-division nondisjunction of all chromosomes. Limited recombination data suggest that these mutants do not alter coincidence, and thus, following the arguments of Sandler et al. (1968), are defective in exchange rather than a precondiiton for exchange. A single female mutant behaves in a manner that is consistent with it being a defect in a gene whose functioning is essential for distributive pairing. Three of the female meiotic mutants cause abnormal chromosome behavior at a number of times in meiosis. Thus, nondisjunction at both meiotic divisions is increased, recombinant chromosomes nondisjoin, and there is a polarized alteration in recombination.—The striking differences between the types of control of meiosis in the two sexes is discussed and attention is drawn to the possible similarities between (1) the disjunction functions of exchange and the process specified by the chromosome-specific male mutants; and (2) the prevention of functional aneuploid gamete formation by distributive disjunction and meiotic drive.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. R. Taylor and C. H. McGowan Cleavage mechanism of human Mus81-Eme1 acting on Holliday-junction structures PNAS, March 11, 2008; 105(10): 3757 - 3762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. McVey, S. L. Andersen, Y. Broze, and J. Sekelsky Multiple Functions of Drosophila BLM Helicase in Maintenance of Genome Stability Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1979 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Lake, K. Teeter, S. L. Page, R. Nielsen, and R. S. Hawley A Genetic Analysis of the Drosophila mcm5 Gene Defines a Domain Specifically Required for Meiotic Recombination Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2151 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Trowbridge, K. McKim, S. J. Brill, and J. Sekelsky Synthetic Lethality of Drosophila in the Absence of the MUS81 Endonuclease and the DmBlm Helicase Is Associated With Elevated Apoptosis Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1993 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Wijeratne, C. Chen, W. Zhang, L. Timofejeva, and H. Ma The Arabidopsis thaliana PARTING DANCERS Gene Encoding a Novel Protein Is Required for Normal Meiotic Homologous Recombination Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2006; 17(3): 1331 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Page and R. S. Hawley The Drosophila Meiotic Mutant mei-352 Is an Allele of klp3A and Reveals a Role for a Kinesin-like Protein in Crossover Distribution Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1797 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Di Giacomo, M. Barchi, F. Baudat, W. Edelmann, S. Keeney, and M. Jasin Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants PNAS, January 18, 2005; 102(3): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Laurencon, C. M. Orme, H. K. Peters, C. L. Boulton, E. K. Vladar, S. A. Langley, E. P. Bakis, D. T. Harris, N. J. Harris, S. M. Wayson, et al. A Large-Scale Screen for Mutagen-Sensitive Loci in Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 217 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Yildiz, H. Kearney, B. C. Kramer, and J. J. Sekelsky Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila DNA Repair and Recombination Gene mei-9 Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Hirai, S. Toyohira, T. Ohsako, and M.-T. Yamamoto Isolation and Cytogenetic Characterization of Male Meiotic Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1795 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Symphorien and R. C. Woodruff Effect of DNA Repair on Aging of Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster: I. mei-41 Locus J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2003; 58(9): B782 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shinohara, K. Sakai, T. Ogawa, and A. Shinohara The Mitotic DNA Damage Checkpoint Proteins Rad17 and Rad24 Are Required for Repair of Double-Strand Breaks During Meiosis in Yeast Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 855 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Laurencon, A. Purdy, J. Sekelsky, R. S. Hawley, and T. T. Su Phenotypic Analysis of Separation-of-Function Alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR Genetics, June 1, 2003; 164(2): 589 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T. C. Carpenter Normal Synaptonemal Complex and Abnormal Recombination Nodules in Two Alleles of the Drosophila Meiotic Mutant mei-W68 Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1337 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Cha and N. Kleckner ATR Homolog Mec1 Promotes Fork Progression, Thus Averting Breaks in Replication Slow Zones Science, July 26, 2002; 297(5581): 602 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Westphal and G. Reuter Recombinogenic Effects of Suppressors of Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila Genetics, February 1, 2002; 160(2): 609 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Page and R. S. Hawley c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein Genes & Dev., December 1, 2001; 15(23): 3130 - 3143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. W. Dobie, C. D. Kennedy, V. M. Velasco, T. L. McGrath, J. Weko, R. W. Patterson, and G. H. Karpen Identification of Chromosome Inheritance Modifiers in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2001; 157(4): 1623 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. E. Tomkiel, B. T. Wakimoto, and A. Briscoe , Jr. The teflon Gene Is Required for Maintenance of Autosomal Homolog Pairing at Meiosis I in Male Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, January 1, 2001; 157(1): 273 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. L. Page, K. S. McKim, B. Deneen, T. L. Van Hook, and R. S. Hawley Genetic Studies of mei-P26 Reveal a Link Between the Processes That Control Germ Cell Proliferation in Both Sexes and Those That Control Meiotic Exchange in Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1757 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Briscoe , Jr. and J. E. Tomkiel Chromosomal Position Effects Reveal Different cis-Acting Requirements for rDNA Transcription and Sex Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, July 1, 2000; 155(3): 1195 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. Vernì, R. Gandhi, M. L. Goldberg, and M. Gatti Genetic and Molecular Analysis of wings apart-like (wapl), a Gene Controlling Heterochromatin Organization in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1693 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. S. Henderson, U. K. Wiegand, D. G. Norman, and D. M. Glover Mutual Correction of Faulty PCNA Subunits in Temperature-Sensitive Lethal mus209 Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1721 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. Liu, J. K. Jang, J. Graham, K. Nycz, and K. S. McKim Two Genes Required for Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Are Expressed From a Dicistronic Message Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1735 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. H. Brodsky, J. J. Sekelsky, G. Tsang, R. S. Hawley, and G. M. Rubin mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development Genes & Dev., March 15, 2000; 14(6): 666 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Brown, E. Feingold, K. W. Broman, and S. L. Sherman Genome-wide variation in recombination in female meiosis: a risk factor for non-disjunction of chromosome 21 Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2000; 9(4): 515 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Grushcow, T. M. Holzen, K. J. Park, T. Weinert, M. Lichten, and D. K. Bishop Saccharomyces cerevisiae Checkpoint Genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 Are Required for Normal Meiotic Recombination Partner Choice Genetics, October 1, 1999; 153(2): 607 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Sekelsky, K. S. McKim, L. Messina, R. L. French, W. D. Hurley, T. Arbel, G. M. Chin, B. Deneen, S. J. Force, K. L. Hari, et al. Identification of Novel Drosophila Meiotic Genes Recovered in a P-Element Screen Genetics, June 1, 1999; 152(2): 529 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. Gonczy, H. Schnabel, T. Kaletta, A. D. Amores, T. Hyman, and R. Schnabel Dissection of Cell Division Processes in the One Cell Stage Caenorhabditis elegans Embryo by Mutational Analysis J. Cell Biol., March 8, 1999; 144(5): 927 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D Bopp, C Schutt, J Puro, H Huang, and R Nothiger Recombination and disjunction in female germ cells of Drosophila depend on the germline activity of the gene sex-lethal Development, January 12, 1999; 126(24): 5785 - 5794. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. G. Robbins Are Unpaired Chromosomes Spermicidal?: A Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Segregation and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males Deficient for the Ribosomal-DNA Genetics, January 1, 1999; 151(1): 251 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. S. McKim and A. Hayashi-Hagihara mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved Genes & Dev., September 15, 1998; 12(18): 2932 - 2942. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. D. McKee, K. Wilhelm, C. Merrill, and X.-j. Ren Male Sterility and Meiotic Drive Associated With Sex Chromosome Rearrangements in Drosophila: Role of X-Y Pairing Genetics, May 1, 1998; 149(1): 143 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Sekelsky, K. C. Burtis, and R. S. Hawley Damage Control: The Pleiotropy of DNA Repair Genes in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, April 1, 1998; 148(4): 1587 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bhui-Kaur, M. F. Goodman, and J. Tower DNA Mismatch Repair Catalyzed by Extracts of Mitotic, Postmitotic, and Senescent Drosophila Tissues and Involvement of mei-9 Gene Function for Full Activity Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 1998; 18(3): 1436 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. G. Sargent, R. L. Rolig, A. E. Kilburn, G. M. Adair, J. H. Wilson, and R. S. Nairn Recombination-dependent deletion formation in mammalian cells deficient in the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 PNAS, November 25, 1997; 94(24): 13122 - 13127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P R Chua and G S Roeder Tam1, a telomere-associated meiotic protein, functions in chromosome synapsis and crossover interference. Genes & Dev., July 15, 1997; 11(14): 1786 - 1800. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Williams, A. Dernburg, J Puro, S Nokkala, and M. Goldberg The Drosophila kinesin-like protein KLP3A is required for proper behavior of male and female pronuclei at fertilization Development, January 6, 1997; 124(12): 2365 - 2376. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K S Keegan, D A Holtzman, A W Plug, E R Christenson, E E Brainerd, G Flaggs, N J Bentley, E M Taylor, M S Meyn, S B Moss, et al. The Atr and Atm protein kinases associate with different sites along meiotically pairing chromosomes. Genes & Dev., October 1, 1996; 10(19): 2423 - 2437. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Shimamoto, T. Tanimura, Y. Yoneda, Y. Kobayakawa, K. Sugasawa, F. Hanaoka, M. Oka, Y. Okada, K. Tanaka, and K. Kohno Expression and Functional Analyses of the Dxpa Gene, the Drosophila Homolog of the Human Excision Repair Gene XPA J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 1995; 270(38): 22452 - 22459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Dawson, A. Murray, and J. Szostak An alternative pathway for meiotic chromosome segregation in yeast Science, November 7, 1986; 234(4777): 713 - 717. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. T. Merino, W. J. Cummings, S. N. Acharya, and M. E. Zolan Replication-dependent early meiotic requirement for Spo11 and Rad50 PNAS, September 12, 2000; 97(19): 10477 - 10482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]