- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Orr, H. A.
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Orr, H. A.
Genetics, Vol. 183, 767-772, November 2009, Copyright © 2009
doi:10.1534/genetics.109.110445
Darwin and Darwinism: The (Alleged) Social Implications of The Origin of Species
H. Allen Orr1
Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
1 Address for correspondence: Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. 14627.
E-mail: orr{at}mail.rochester.edu
Most scientific theories, even revolutionary ones, change the practice of a particular science but have few consequences for culture or society at large. But Darwinism, it has often been said, is different in this respect. Since the publication of The Origin of Species, many have claimed that Darwinism has a number of profound social implications. Here, I briefly consider three of these: the economic, the political, and the religious. I suggest that, for the most part, these supposed implications have been misconstrued or exaggerated. Indeed, it is reasonably clear that the chain of implication sometimes primarily ran in the opposite direction—from, for instance, economics and political theory to Darwinism.