- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supporting Information
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.100024v1
genetics.108.100024v2
182/4/1129 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Brandvain, Y.
- Articles by Wade, M. J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Brandvain, Y.
- Articles by Wade, M. J.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on May 17, 2009.
Genetics, Vol. 182, 1129-1139, August 2009, Copyright © 2009
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.100024
The Functional Transfer of Genes From the Mitochondria to the Nucleus: The Effects of Selection, Mutation, Population Size and Rate of Self-Fertilization
Yaniv Brandvain1 and Michael J. Wade
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
1 Corresponding author: Indiana University, Department of Biology, 1001 E. Third St., Bloomington, IN 47405.
E-mail: ybrandva{at}indiana.edu
The transfer of mitochondrial genes to the nucleus is a recurrent and consistent feature of eukaryotic genome evolution. Although many theories have been proposed to explain such transfers, little relevant data exist. The observation that clonal and self-fertilizing plants transfer more mitochondrial genes to their nuclei than do outcrossing plants contradicts predictions of major theories based on nuclear recombination and leaves a gap in our conceptual understanding how the observed pattern of gene transfer could arise. Here, with a series of deterministic and stochastic simulations, we show how epistatic selection and relative mutation rates of mitochondrial and nuclear genes influence mitochondrial-to-nuclear gene transfer. Specifically, we show that when there is a benefit to having a mitochondrial gene present in the nucleus, but absent in the mitochondria, self-fertilization dramatically increases both the rate and the probability of gene transfer. However, absent such a benefit, when mitochondrial mutation rates exceed those of the nucleus, self-fertilization decreases the rate and probability of transfer. This latter effect, however, is much weaker than the former. Our results are relevant to understanding the probabilities of fixation when loci in different genomes interact.