- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Supporting Information
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.098863v1
182/3/875 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zhu, C.
- Articles by Yu, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zhu, C.
- Articles by Yu, J.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on May 4, 2009.
Genetics, Vol. 182, 875-888, July 2009, Copyright © 2009
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.098863
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling Corrects for Population Structure in Association Mapping With Different Sample Types
Chengsong Zhu and Jianming Yu1
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, Kansas, 66506
1 Corresponding author: Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501.
E-mail: jyu{at}ksu.edu
Recent research has developed various promising methods to control for population structure in genomewide association mapping of complex traits, but systematic examination of how well these methods perform under different genetic scenarios is still lacking. Appropriate methods for controlling genetic relationships among individuals need to balance the concern of false positives and statistical power, which can vary for different association sample types. We used a series of simulated samples and empirical data sets from cross- and self-pollinated species to demonstrate the performance of several contemporary methods in correcting for different types of genetic relationships encountered in association analysis. We proposed a two-stage dimension determination approach for both principal component analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) to capture the major structure pattern in association mapping samples. Our results showed that by exploiting both genotypic and phenotypic information, this two-stage dimension determination approach balances the trade-off between data fit and model complexity, resulting in an effective reduction in false positive rate with minimum loss in statistical power. Further, the nMDS technique of correcting for genetic relationship proved to be a powerful complement to other existing methods. Our findings highlight the significance of appropriate application of different statistical methods for dealing with complex genetic relationships in various genomewide association studies.