- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.093716v1
180/3/1617 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Related articles in Genetics
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zhang, X.
- Articles by Eickbush, T. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zhang, X.
- Articles by Eickbush, T. H.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 14, 2008.
Genetics, Vol. 180, 1617-1626, November 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.093716
Role of Recombination in the Long-Term Retention of Transposable Elements in rRNA Gene Loci
Xian Zhang, Michael T. Eickbush and Thomas H. Eickbush1
Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627-0211
1 Corresponding author: Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0211.
E-mail: eick{at}mail.rochester.edu
Multiple theoretical studies have focused on the concerted evolution of the tandemly repeated rRNA genes of eukaryotes; however, these studies did not consider the transposable elements that interrupt the rRNA genes in many organisms. For example, in insects, R1 and R2 have been stable components of the rDNA locus for hundreds of millions of years, suggesting either that they have minimal effects on fitness or that they are unable to be eliminated. We constructed a simulation model of recombination and retrotransposition within the rDNA locus that addresses the population dynamics and fitness consequences associated with R1 and R2 insertions. The simulations suggest that even without R1 and R2 retrotransposition the frequent sister chromatid exchanges postulated from various empirical studies will, in combination with selection, generate rDNA loci that are much larger than those needed for transcription. These large loci enable the host to tolerate high levels of R1 and R2 insertions with little fitness consequences. Changes in retrotransposition rates are likely to be accommodated by adjustments in sister chromatid exchange (SCE) rate, rather than by direct selection on the number of uninserted rDNA units. These simulations suggest that the rDNA locus serves as an ideal niche for the long-term survival of transposable elements.
Related articles in Genetics:
ISSUE HIGHLIGHTS
Genetics 2008 180: NP.