- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.092122v1
180/2/1177 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zhang, L.
- Articles by Wang, J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zhang, L.
- Articles by Wang, J.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 9, 2008.
Genetics, Vol. 180, 1177-1190, October 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.092122
Interactions Between Markers Can Be Caused by the Dominance Effect of Quantitative Trait Loci
Luyan Zhang*,
,
Huihui Li*,
,
Zhonglai Li* and
Jiankang Wang
,1
* School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China and
Institute of Crop Science, The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement and CIMMYT China Office, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
1 Corresponding author: Institute of Crop Science and CIMMYT China, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South St., Beijing 100081, China.
E-mail: wangjk{at}caas.net.cn
F2 populations are commonly used in genetic studies of animals and plants. For simplicity, most quantitative trait locus or loci (QTL) mapping methods have been developed on the basis of populations having two distinct genotypes at each polymorphic marker or gene locus. In this study, we demonstrate that dominance can cause the interactions between markers and propose an inclusive linear model that includes marker variables and marker interactions so as to completely control both additive and dominance effects of QTL. The proposed linear model is the theoretical basis for inclusive composite-interval QTL mapping (ICIM) for F2 populations, which consists of two steps: first, the best regression model is selected by stepwise regression, which approximately identifies markers and marker interactions explaining both additive and dominance variations; second, the interval mapping approach is applied to the phenotypic values adjusted by the regression model selected in the first step. Due to the limited mapping population size, the large number of variables, and multicollinearity between variables, coefficients in the inclusive linear model cannot be accurately determined in the first step. Interval mapping is necessary in the second step to fine tune the QTL to their true positions. The efficiency of including marker interactions in mapping additive and dominance QTL was demonstrated by extensive simulations using three QTL distribution models with two population sizes and an actual rice F2 population.