- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.085563v1
179/4/2229 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Friberg, U.
- Articles by Rice, W. R.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Friberg, U.
- Articles by Rice, W. R.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on August 9, 2008.
Genetics, Vol. 179, 2229-2238, August 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.085563
Cut Thy Neighbor: Cyclic Birth and Death of Recombination Hotspots via Genetic Conflict
Urban Friberg1 and William R. Rice
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
1 Corresponding author: Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9610.
E-mail: friberg{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu
Most recombination takes place in numerous, localized regions called hotspots. However, empirical evidence indicates that nascent hotspots are susceptible to removal due to biased gene conversion, so it is paradoxical that they should be so widespread. Previous modeling work has shown that hotspots can evolve due to genetic drift overpowering their intrinsic disadvantage. Here we synthesize recent theoretical and empirical results to show how natural selection can favor hotspots. We propose that hotspots are part of a cycle of antagonistic coevolution between two tightly linked chromosomal regions: an inducer region that initiates recombination during meiosis by cutting within a nearby region of DNA and the cut region itself, which can evolve to be resistant to cutting. Antagonistic coevolution between inducers and their cut sites is driven by recurrent episodes of Hill–Robertson interference, genetic hitchhiking, and biased gene conversion.