- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.108.088526v1
179/4/2061 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Moorad, J. A.
- Articles by Promislow, D. E. L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Moorad, J. A.
- Articles by Promislow, D. E. L.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on July 27, 2008.
Genetics, Vol. 179, 2061-2073, August 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.108.088526
A Theory of Age-Dependent Mutation and Senescence
Jacob A. Moorad1 and Daniel E. L. Promislow
Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-7223
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7223.
E-mail: jmoorad{at}uga.edu
Laboratory experiments show us that the deleterious character of accumulated novel age-specific mutations is reduced and made less variable with increased age. While theories of aging predict that the frequency of deleterious mutations at mutation–selection equilibrium will increase with the mutation's age of effect, they do not account for these age-related changes in the distribution of de novo mutational effects. Furthermore, no model predicts why this dependence of mutational effects upon age exists. Because the nature of mutational distributions plays a critical role in shaping patterns of senescence, we need to develop aging theory that explains and incorporates these effects. Here we propose a model that explains the age dependency of mutational effects by extending Fisher's geometrical model of adaptation to include a temporal dimension. Using a combination of simple analytical arguments and simulations, we show that our model predicts age-specific mutational distributions that are consistent with observations from mutation-accumulation experiments. Simulations show us that these age-specific mutational effects may generate patterns of senescence at mutation–selection equilibrium that are consistent with observed demographic patterns that are otherwise difficult to explain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. A. Moorad and D. E.L. Promislow What can genetic variation tell us about the evolution of senescence? Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2009; 276(1665): 2271 - 2278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|