- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Data Supplement
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Related articles in Genetics
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Turner, T. L.
- Articles by Begun, D. J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Turner, T. L.
- Articles by Begun, D. J.
Genetics, Vol. 179, 455-473, May 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.083659
Genomic Analysis of Adaptive Differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster
Thomas L. Turner1, Mia T. Levine, Melissa L. Eckert and David J. Begun
Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
1 Corresponding author: 2320 Storer Hall, 1 Shields Ave., University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
E-mail: tlturner{at}ucdavis.edu
Drosophila melanogaster shows clinal variation along latitudinal transects on multiple continents for several phenotypes, allozyme variants, sequence variants, and chromosome inversions. Previous investigation suggests that many such clines are due to spatially varying selection rather than demographic history, but the genomic extent of such selection is unknown. To map differentiation throughout the genome, we hybridized DNA from temperate and subtropical populations to Affymetrix tiling arrays. The dense genomic sampling of variants and low level of linkage disequilibrium in D. melanogaster enabled identification of many small, differentiated regions. Many regions are differentiated in parallel in the United States and Australia, strongly supporting the idea that they are influenced by spatially varying selection. Genomic differentiation is distributed nonrandomly with respect to gene function, even in regions differentiated on only one continent, providing further evidence for the role of selection. These data provide candidate genes for phenotypes known to vary clinally and implicate interesting new processes in genotype-by-environment interactions, including chorion proteins, proteins regulating meiotic recombination and segregation, gustatory and olfactory receptors, and proteins affecting synaptic function and behavior. This portrait of differentiation provides a genomic perspective on adaptation and the maintenance of variation through spatially varying selection.
Related articles in Genetics:
ISSUE HIGHLIGHTS
Genetics 2008 179: NP.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. K. Burke and M. R. Rose Experimental evolution with Drosophila Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): R1847 - R1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Anderson, W. D. Gilliland, and C. H. Langley Molecular Population Genetics and Evolution of Drosophila Meiosis Genes Genetics, January 1, 2009; 181(1): 177 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Aguade Nucleotide and Copy-Number Polymorphism at the Odorant Receptor Genes Or22a and Or22b in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2009; 26(1): 61 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Levine and D. J. Begun Evidence of Spatially Varying Selection Acting on Four Chromatin-Remodeling Loci in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 475 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|