- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.082560v1
178/3/1491 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Faubet, P.
- Articles by Gaggiotti, O. E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Faubet, P.
- Articles by Gaggiotti, O. E.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on February 1, 2008.
Genetics, Vol. 178, 1491-1504, March 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.082560
A New Bayesian Method to Identify the Environmental Factors That Influence Recent Migration
Pierre Faubet and Oscar E. Gaggiotti1
Génomique des Populations et Biodiversité Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS UMR 5553, Université Joseph Fourier, 38041 Grenoble, France
1 Corresponding author: LECA, BP 53, 2233 Rue de la Piscine, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
E-mail: oscar.gaggiotti{at}ujf-grenoble.fr
We present a new multilocus genotype method that makes inferences about recent immigration rates and identifies the environmental factors that are more likely to explain observed gene flow patterns. It also estimates population-specific inbreeding coefficients, allele frequencies, and local population FST's and performs individual assignments. We generate synthetic data sets to determine the region of the parameter space where our method is and is not able to provide accurate estimates. Our simulation study indicates that reliable results can be obtained when the global level of genetic differentiation (FST) is >1%, the number of loci is only 10, and sample sizes are of the order of 50 individuals per population. We illustrate our method by applying it to Pakistani human data, considering altitude and geographic distance as explanatory factors. Our results suggest that altitude explains better the genetic data than geographic distance. Additionally, they show that southern low-altitude populations have higher migration rates than northern high-altitude ones.