| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol. 178, 1473-1489, March 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.082131
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,1
* Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand and
The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, CSIRO Land and Water, Wodonga, Victoria 3689, Australia
1 Corresponding author: The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, CSIRO Land and Water, P.O. Box 991, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia.
E-mail: rick.stoffels{at}csiro.au
, and incorporate it, as well as the degree of recognition degeneracy, m, into a model of heterozygote advantage that utilizes a set-theoretic definition of fitness. Counterintuitively, we show that levels of polymorphism are positively related to m and that a high level of recognition degeneracy is necessary for polymorphism at MHC loci under heterozygote advantage. Increasing
reduces levels of polymorphism considerably. Hence, if intersection advantage is significant for MHC genotypes, then heterozygote advantage may not explain the very high levels of polymorphism observed at MHC genes.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |