- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zheng, X.
- Articles by Sehgal, A.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zheng, X.
- Articles by Sehgal, A.
Genetics, Vol. 178, 1147-1155, March 2008, Copyright © 2008
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.088658
Probing the Relative Importance of Molecular Oscillations in the Circadian Clock
Xiangzhong Zheng and Amita Sehgal1
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
1 Corresponding author: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Neuroscience, 232 Stemmler Hall, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3450 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
E-mail: amita{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
Circadian (
24 hr) rhythms of behavior and physiology are driven by molecular clocks that are endogenous to most organisms. The mechanisms underlying these clocks are remarkably conserved across evolution and typically consist of auto-regulatory loops in which specific proteins (clock proteins) rhythmically repress expression of their own genes. Such regulation maintains 24-hr cycles of RNA and protein expression. Despite the conservation of these mechanisms, however, questions are now being raised about the relevance of different molecular oscillations. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that oscillations of some critical clock genes can be eliminated without loss of basic clock function. Here, we describe the multiple levels at which clock gene/protein expression and function can be rhythmically regulated—transcription, protein expression, post-translational modification, and localization—and speculate as to which aspect of this regulation is most critical. While the review is focused on Drosophila, we include some discussion of mammalian clocks to indicate the extent to which the questions concerning clock mechanisms are similar, regardless of the organism under study.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. Akten, M. M. Tangredi, E. Jauch, M. A. Roberts, F. Ng, T. Raabe, and F. R. Jackson Ribosomal S6 Kinase Cooperates with Casein Kinase 2 to Modulate the Drosophila Circadian Molecular Oscillator J. Neurosci., January 14, 2009; 29(2): 466 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Dickmeis Glucocorticoids and the circadian clock J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2009; 200(1): 3 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|