- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Habier, D.
- Articles by Dekkers, J. C. M.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Habier, D.
- Articles by Dekkers, J. C. M.
Genetics, Vol. 177, 2389-2397, December 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.081190
The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values
D. Habier1, R. L. Fernando and J. C. M. Dekkers
Department of Animal Science and Center for Integrated Animal Genomics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
1 Corresponding author: Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 233 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA 50011-3150.
E-mail: dhabier{at}iastate.edu
The success of genomic selection depends on the potential to predict genome-assisted breeding values (GEBVs) with high accuracy over several generations without additional phenotyping after estimating marker effects. Results from both simulations and practical applications have to be evaluated for this potential, which requires linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and QTL. This study shows that markers can capture genetic relationships among genotyped animals, thereby affecting accuracies of GEBVs. Strategies to validate the accuracy of GEBVs due to LD are given. Simulations were used to show that accuracies of GEBVs obtained by fixed regression–least squares (FR–LS), random regression–best linear unbiased prediction (RR–BLUP), and Bayes-B are nonzero even without LD. When LD was present, accuracies decrease rapidly in generations after estimation due to the decay of genetic relationships. However, there is a persistent accuracy due to LD, which can be estimated by modeling the decay of genetic relationships and the decay of LD. The impact of genetic relationships was greatest for RR–BLUP. The accuracy of GEBVs can result entirely from genetic relationships captured by markers, and to validate the potential of genomic selection, several generations have to be analyzed to estimate the accuracy due to LD. The method of choice was Bayes-B; FR–LS should be investigated further, whereas RR–BLUP cannot be recommended.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. Toosi, R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations J Anim Sci, January 1, 2010; 88(1): 32 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. P. W. de Roos, B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard Reliability of Genomic Predictions Across Multiple Populations Genetics, December 1, 2009; 183(4): 1545 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Luan, J. A. Woolliams, S. Lien, M. Kent, M. Svendsen, and T. H. E. Meuwissen The Accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian Red Cattle Assessed by Cross-Validation Genetics, November 1, 2009; 183(3): 1119 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, and I. Misztal A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4656 - 4663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gianola, G. de los Campos, W. G. Hill, E. Manfredi, and R. Fernando Additive Genetic Variability and the Bayesian Alphabet Genetics, September 1, 2009; 183(1): 347 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. P. Piepho Ridge Regression and Extensions for Genomewide Selection in Maize Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1165 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. de los Campos, H. Naya, D. Gianola, J. Crossa, A. Legarra, E. Manfredi, K. Weigel, and J. M. Cotes Predicting Quantitative Traits With Regression Models for Dense Molecular Markers and Pedigree Genetics, May 1, 2009; 182(1): 375 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Zhong, J. C. M. Dekkers, R. L. Fernando, and J.-L. Jannink Factors Affecting Accuracy From Genomic Selection in Populations Derived From Multiple Inbred Lines: A Barley Case Study Genetics, May 1, 2009; 182(1): 355 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Habier, R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers Genomic Selection Using Low-Density Marker Panels Genetics, May 1, 2009; 182(1): 343 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Hayes, P. J. Bowman, A. J. Chamberlain, and M. E. Goddard Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2009; 92(2): 433 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Heffner, M. E. Sorrells, and J.-L. Jannink Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement Crop Sci., January 28, 2009; 49(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Konig, H. Simianer, and A. Willam Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2009; 92(1): 382 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Legarra, C. Robert-Granie, E. Manfredi, and J.-M. Elsen Performance of Genomic Selection in Mice Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 611 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|