- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.069310v1
177/1/9 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Related articles in Genetics
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Ro, S.
- Articles by Rannala, B.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Ro, S.
- Articles by Rannala, B.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on July 1, 2007.
Genetics, Vol. 177, 9-16, September 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.069310
Inferring Somatic Mutation Rates Using the Stop-Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein Mouse
Simon Ro* and
Bruce Rannala
,1
* Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada and
Genome Center and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
1 Corresponding author: Genome Center, University of California, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616.
E-mail: brannala{at}ucdavis.edu
A new method is developed for estimating rates of somatic mutation in vivo. The stop-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgenic mouse carries multiple copies of an EGFP gene with a premature stop codon. The gene can revert to a functional form via point mutations. Mice treated with a potent mutagen, N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), and mice treated with a vehicle alone are assayed for mutations in liver cells. A stochastic model is developed to model the mutation and gene expression processes and maximum-likelihood estimators of the model parameters are derived. A likelihood-ratio test (LRT) is developed for detecting mutagenicity. Parametric bootstrap simulations are used to obtain confidence intervals of the parameter estimates and to estimate the significance of the LRT. The LRT is highly significant (
< 0.01) and the 95% confidence interval for the relative effect of the mutagen (the ratio of the rate of mutation during the interval of mutagen exposure to the rate of background mutation) ranges from a minimum 200-fold effect of the mutagen to a maximum 2000-fold effect.
Related articles in Genetics:
ISSUE HIGHLIGHTS
Genetics 2007 177: NP.