- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.075358v1
177/1/567 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Zhong, S.
- Articles by Jannink, J.-L.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Zhong, S.
- Articles by Jannink, J.-L.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on July 29, 2007.
Genetics, Vol. 177, 567-576, September 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.075358
Using Quantitative Trait Loci Results to Discriminate Among Crosses on the Basis of Their Progeny Mean and Variance
Shengqiang Zhong* and
Jean-Luc Jannink
,1
* Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1010 and
USDA–ARS, U.S. Plant, Soil, and Nutrition Laboratory, Ithaca, New York 14583
1 Corresponding author: U.S. Plant, Soil, and Nutrition Laboratory, USDA–ARS, Ithaca, NY 14853-2901.
E-mail: jeanluc.jannink{at}ars.usda.gov
To develop inbred lines, parents are crossed to generate segregating populations from which superior inbred progeny are selected. The value of a particular cross thus depends on the expected performance of its best progeny, which we call the superior progeny value. Superior progeny value is a linear combination of the mean of the cross's progeny and their standard deviation. In this study we specify theory to predict a cross's progeny standard deviation from QTL results and explore analytically and by simulation the variance of that standard deviation under different genetic models. We then study the impact of different QTL analysis methods on the prediction accuracy of a cross's superior progeny value. We show that including all markers, rather than only markers with significant effects, improves the prediction. Methods that account for the uncertainty of the QTL analysis by integrating over the posterior distributions of effect estimates also produce better predictions than methods that retain only point estimates from the QTL analysis. The utility of including estimates of a cross's among-progeny standard deviation in the prediction increases with increasing heritability and marker density but decreasing genome size and QTL number. This utility is also higher if crosses are envisioned only among the best parents rather than among all parents. Nevertheless, we show that among crosses the variance of progeny means is generally much greater than the variance of progeny standard deviations, restricting the utility of estimates of progeny standard deviations to a relatively small parameter space.