- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.107.076539v1
176/4/2003 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Lee, K.
- Articles by Lee, S. E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Lee, K.
- Articles by Lee, S. E.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on June 11, 2007.
Genetics, Vol. 176, 2003-2014, August 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.076539
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-Dependent Single-Strand DNA Formation at DNA Break Promotes Microhomology-Mediated End Joining
Kihoon Lee and Sang Eun Lee1
Department of Molecular Medicine and Institute of Biotechnology University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78245
1 Corresponding author: Department of Molecular Medicine and Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lambda Drive, San Antonio, TX 78245.
E-mail: lees4{at}uthscsa.edu
Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) joins DNA ends via short stretches [5–20 nucleotides (nt)] of direct repeat sequences, yielding deletions of intervening sequences. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA) are other error prone processes that anneal single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) via a few bases (<5 nt) or extensive direct repeat homologies (>20 nt). Although the genetic components involved in MMEJ are largely unknown, those in NHEJ and SSA are characterized in some detail. Here, we surveyed the role of NHEJ or SSA factors in joining of double-strand breaks (DSBs) with no complementary DNA ends that rely primarily on MMEJ repair. We found that MMEJ requires the nuclease activity of Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2, 3' flap removal by Rad1/Rad10, Nej1, and DNA synthesis by multiple polymerases including Pol4, Rad30, Rev3, and Pol32. The mismatch repair proteins, Rad52 group genes, and Rad27 are dispensable for MMEJ. Sae2 and Tel1 promote MMEJ but inhibit NHEJ, likely by regulating Mre11-dependent ssDNA accumulation at DNA break. Our data support the role of Sae2 and Tel1 in MMEJ and genome integrity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Oliveira, J. Senz, P. Kaurah, H. Pinheiro, R. Sanges, A. Haegert, G. Corso, J. Schouten, R. Fitzgerald, H. Vogelsang, et al. Germline CDH1 deletions in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer families Hum. Mol. Genet., May 1, 2009; 18(9): 1545 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Grandin and M. Charbonneau Telomerase- and Rad52-Independent Immortalization of Budding Yeast by an Inherited-Long-Telomere Pathway of Telomeric Repeat Amplification Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2009; 29(4): 965 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

