| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol. 176, 1101-1118, June 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.071555
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
1 Corresponding author: Department of Biological Sciences, 451 Herrin Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
E-mail: vancleve{at}stanford.edu
and selection is weak. The condition for invasion is always heavily contingent upon the extent of dominance. Imprinting is more likely in the sex experiencing weaker selection only under some parameter regimes, whereas imprinting by either sex is equally likely under other regimes. The second model shows that a modifier allele that induces imprinting will increase when imprinting has a direct selective advantage. The results are not qualitatively dependent on whether the modifier locus is autosomal or X linked. Related articles in Genetics:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Patten and D. Haig Reciprocally Imprinted Genes and the Response to Selection on One Sex Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1389 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gordo and P. R. A. Campos Sex and Deleterious Mutations Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 621 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |