Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on April 15, 2007.

Genetics, Vol. 176, 7-14, May 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.107.074468

Why Are There Still Over 1000 Uncharacterized Yeast Genes?

Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada

1 Corresponding author: Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, 160 College St., Room 1302, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada.
E-mail: t.hughes{at}utoronto.

The yeast genetics community has embraced genomic biology, and there is a general understanding that obtaining a full encyclopedia of functions of the ~6000 genes is a worthwhile goal. The yeast literature comprises over 40,000 research papers, and the number of yeast researchers exceeds the number of genes. There are mutated and tagged alleles for virtually every gene, and hundreds of high-throughput data sets and computational analyses have been described. Why, then, are there >1000 genes still listed as uncharacterized on the Saccharomyces Genome Database, 10 years after sequencing the genome of this powerful model organism? Examination of the currently uncharacterized gene set suggests that while some are small or newly discovered, the vast majority were evident from the initial genome sequence. Most are present in multiple genomics data sets, which may provide clues to function. In addition, roughly half contain recognizable protein domains, and many of these suggest specific metabolic activities. Notably, the uncharacterized gene set is highly enriched for genes whose only homologs are in other fungi. Achieving a full catalog of yeast gene functions may require a greater focus on the life of yeast outside the laboratory.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
G. Musso, M. Costanzo, M. Huangfu, A. M. Smith, J. Paw, B.-J. San Luis, C. Boone, G. Giaever, C. Nislow, A. Emili, et al.
The extensive and condition-dependent nature of epistasis among whole-genome duplicates in yeast
Genome Res., July 1, 2008; 18(7): 1092 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Tarassov, V. Messier, C. R. Landry, S. Radinovic, M. M. S. Molina, I. Shames, Y. Malitskaya, J. Vogel, H. Bussey, and S. W. Michnick
An in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome
Science, June 13, 2008; 320(5882): 1465 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. L. Hong, R. Balakrishnan, Q. Dong, K. R. Christie, J. Park, G. Binkley, M. C. Costanzo, S. S. Dwight, S. R. Engel, D. G. Fisk, et al.
Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: new data sources and annotation methods
Nucleic Acids Res., January 11, 2008; 36(suppl_1): D577 - D581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
J. Botet, L. Mateos, J. L. Revuelta, and M. A. Santos
A Chemogenomic Screening of Sulfanilamide-Hypersensitive Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutants Uncovers ABZ2, the Gene Encoding a Fungal Aminodeoxychorismate Lyase
Eukaryot. Cell, November 1, 2007; 6(11): 2102 - 2111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]