- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.068304v1
175/4/1761 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Garcia, L. R.
- Articles by Koo, P.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Garcia, L. R.
- Articles by Koo, P.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on February 4, 2007.
Genetics, Vol. 175, 1761-1771, April 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.068304
Diversity in Mating Behavior of Hermaphroditic and Male–Female Caenorhabditis Nematodes
L. Rene Garcia1, Brigitte LeBoeuf and Pamela Koo
Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3258
1 Corresponding author: Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3258.
E-mail: rgarcia{at}mail.bio.tamu.edu
In this study, we addressed why Caenorhabditis elegans males are inefficient at fertilizing their hermaphrodites. During copulation, hermaphrodites generally move away from males before they become impregnated. C. elegans hermaphrodites reproduce by internal self-fertilization, so that copulation with males is not required for species propagation. The hermaphroditic mode of reproduction could potentially relax selection for genes that optimize male mating behavior. We examined males from hermaphroditic and gonochoristic (male–female copulation) Caenorhabditis species to determine if they use different sensory and motor mechanisms to control their mating behavior. Instead, we found through laser ablation analysis and behavioral observations that hermaphroditic C. briggsae and gonochoristic C. remanei and Caenorhabditis species 4, PB2801 males produce a factor that immobilizes females during copulation. This factor also stimulates the vulval slit to widen, so that the male copulatory spicules can easily insert. C. elegans and C. briggsae hermaphrodites are not affected by this factor. We suggest that sensory and motor execution of mating behavior have not significantly changed among males of different Caenorhabditis species; however, during the evolution of internal self-fertilization, hermaphrodites have lost the ability to respond to the male soporific-inducing factor.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  V. Katju, E. M. LaBeau, K. J. Lipinski, and U. Bergthorsson Sex Change by Gene Conversion in a Caenorhabditis elegans fog-2 Mutant Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 669 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and N. L. Washington Patterns of Molecular Evolution in Caenorhabditis Preclude Ancient Origins of Selfing Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2093 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|