- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.069252v1
175/3/1213 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Related articles in Genetics
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Tevzadze, G. G.
- Articles by Esposito, R. E.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Tevzadze, G. G.
- Articles by Esposito, R. E.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on December 18, 2006.
Genetics, Vol. 175, 1213-1227, March 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.069252
Genetic Evidence for a SPO1-Dependent Signaling Pathway Controlling Meiotic Progression in Yeast
Gela G. Tevzadze, Jessica V. Pierce and Rochelle Easton Esposito1
Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
1 Corresponding author: Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, 920 E. 58th St., Chicago, IL 60637.
E-mail: re-esposito{at}uchicago.edu
The yeast spindle pole body (SPB) plays a unique role in meiosis, initiating both spindle assembly and prospore membrane synthesis. SPO1, induced early in development, encodes a meiosis-specific phospholipase B (PLB) homolog required at three stages of SPB morphogenesis: MI, MII, and spore formation. Here we report in-depth analysis of the SPO1 gene including its transcriptional control by regulators of early gene expression, protein localization to the ER lumen and periplasmic space, and molecular genetic studies of its role in meiosis. Evidence is presented that multiple arrest points in spo1
occur independently, demonstrating that Spo1 acts at distinct steps. Loss of Spo1 is suppressed by high-copy glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) proteins, dependent on sequence, timing, and strength of induction in meiosis. Since phosphatidylinositol (PI) serves as both an anchor component and a lipase substrate, we hypothesized that GPI-protein expression might substitute for Spo1 by decreasing levels of its potential substrates, PI and phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PIPs). Partial spo1
complementation by PLB3 (encoding a unique PLB capable of cleaving PI) and relatively strong Spo1 binding to PI(4)P derivatives (via a novel N-terminal lysine-rich fragment essential for Spo1 function) are consistent with this view. Epistasis of SPO1 mutations to those in SPO14 (encoding a PLD involved in signaling) and physical interaction of Spo1 with Spo23, a protein regulating PI synthesis required for wild-type sporulation, further support this notion. Taken together these findings implicate PI and/or PIPs in Spo1 function and suggest the existence of a novel Spo1-dependent meiosis-specific signaling pathway required for progression of MI, MII, and spore formation via regulation of the SPB.
Related articles in Genetics:
ISSUE HIGHLIGHTS
Genetics 2007 175: NP.
