help button home button Genetics J Exp Med
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on December 6, 2006.

Genetics, Vol. 175, 855-865, February 2007, Copyright © 2007
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.059808

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.059808v1
175/2/855    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johannes, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johannes, F.

Mapping Temporally Varying Quantitative Trait Loci in Time-to-Failure Experiments

Frank Johannes1

Center for Developmental and Health Genetics and Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16803

1 Address for correspondence: 101 Amy Gardner House, University Park, PA 16803.
E-mail: fzj100{at}psu.edu

Existing methods for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) in time-to-failure experiments assume that the QTL effect is constant over the course of the study. This assumption may be violated when the gene(s) underlying the QTL are up- or downregulated on a biologically meaningful timescale. In such situations, models that assume a constant effect can fail to detect QTL in a whole-genome scan. To investigate this possibility, we utilize an extension of the Cox model (EC model) within an interval-mapping framework. In its simplest form, this model assumes that the QTL effect changes at some time point t0 and follows a linear function before and after this change point. The approximate time point at which this change occurs is estimated. Using simulated and real data, we compare the mapping performance of the EC model to the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, which explicitly assumes a constant effect. The results show that the EC model detects time-dependent QTL, which the CPH model fails to detect. At the same time, the EC model recovers all of the QTL the CPH model detects. We conclude that potentially important QTL may be missed if their time-dependent effects are not accounted for.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Genetics Society of America.