help button home button Genetics Journal Watch
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on October 8, 2006.

Genetics, Vol. 174, 2071-2079, December 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.062406

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.062406v1
174/4/2071    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, R. D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Otto, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, R. D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Otto, S. P.

The Distribution of Beneficial Mutant Effects Under Strong Selection

Rowan D. H. Barrett1, Leithen K. M'Gonigle and Sarah P. Otto

Zoology Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada

1 Corresponding author: Zoology Department, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
E-mail: rbarrett{at}zoology.ubc.ca

For a general theory of adaptation, it is essential to know the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations. Recent theoretical and empirical studies have made considerable progress in determining the characteristics of this distribution. To date, the experiments have largely verified the theoretical predictions. Despite the fact that the theoretical work has assumed small selection coefficients, strong selection has been observed in some experiments, especially those involving novel environments. Here, we derive the distribution of fitness effects among fixed beneficial mutants without the restriction of low selection coefficients. The fate of strongly favored alleles is less affected by stochastic drift while rare, causing the distribution of fitness effects among fixed beneficial mutations to reflect more closely the distribution among all newly arising beneficial mutations. We also find that when many alleles compete for fixation within an asexual population (clonal interference), the beneficial effects of a newly fixed mutant cannot be well estimated because of the high number of subsequent mutations that arise within the genome, regardless of whether selection is strong or weak.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S.-C. Park and J. Krug
Clonal interference in large populations
PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 18135 - 18140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
L. Perfeito, L. Fernandes, C. Mota, and I. Gordo
Adaptive Mutations in Bacteria: High Rate and Small Effects
Science, August 10, 2007; 317(5839): 813 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Genetics Society of America.