- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.058701v1
174/2/601 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Related articles in Genetics
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Harris, J.
- Articles by Ahmed, S.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Harris, J.
- Articles by Ahmed, S.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 1, 2006.
Genetics, Vol. 174, 601-616, October 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.058701
Mutator Phenotype of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA Damage Checkpoint Mutants
Jasper Harris*,1,
Mia Lowden*,
,
Iuval Clejan,
,
Monika Tzoneva
,
James H. Thomas,
Jonathan Hodgkin** and
Shawn Ahmed*,,,,2
* Department of Biology, Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, ** Genetics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom and MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 2QH, United Kingdom
2 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280.
E-mail: shawn{at}med.unc.edu
DNA damage response proteins identify sites of DNA damage and signal to downstream effectors that orchestrate either apoptosis or arrest of the cell cycle and DNA repair. The C. elegans DNA damage response mutants mrt-2, hus-1, and clk-2(mn159) displayed 8- to 15-fold increases in the frequency of spontaneous mutation in their germlines. Many of these mutations were small- to medium-sized deletions, some of which had unusual sequences at their breakpoints such as purine-rich tracts or direct or inverted repeats. Although DNA-damage-induced apoptosis is abrogated in the mrt-2, hus-1, and clk-2 mutant backgrounds, lack of the apoptotic branch of the DNA damage response pathway in cep-1/p53, ced-3, and ced-4 mutants did not result in a Mutator phenotype. Thus, DNA damage checkpoint proteins suppress the frequency of mutation by ensuring that spontaneous DNA damage is accurately repaired in C. elegans germ cells. Although DNA damage response defects that predispose humans to cancer are known to result in large-scale chromosome aberrations, our results suggest that small- to medium-sized deletions may also play roles in the development of cancer.
Related articles in Genetics:
Issue Highlights
Genetics 2006 174: NP.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. L. Yanowitz Genome Integrity Is Regulated by the Caenorhabditis elegans Rad51D Homolog rfs-1 Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 249 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Boerckel, D. Walker, and S. Ahmed The Caenorhabditis elegans Rad17 Homolog HPR-17 Is Required for Telomere Replication Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 703 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|