- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.106.055632v1
173/4/2179 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Kayser, M.
- Articles by Amos, W.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Kayser, M.
- Articles by Amos, W.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on June 18, 2006.
Genetics, Vol. 173, 2179-2186, August 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.055632
Microsatellite Length Differences Between Humans and Chimpanzees at Autosomal Loci Are Not Found at Equivalent Haploid Y Chromosomal Loci
Manfred Kayser*,
,1,
Edward J. Vowles
,1,
Dennis Kappei
and
William Amos
,2
* Department of Forensic Molecular Biology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom and
Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
2 Corresponding author: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St., Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom.
E-mail: wa100{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk
When homologous microsatellites are compared between species, significant differences in mean length are often noted. A dominant cause of these length differences is ascertainment bias due to selection for maximum repeat number and repeat purity when the markers are being developed. However, even after ascertainment bias has been allowed for through reciprocal comparisons, significant length differences remain, suggesting that the average microsatellite mutation rate differs between species. Two classes of mechanism have been proposed: rapid evolution of enzymes involved in the generation and repair of slippage products (enzyme evolution model) and heterozygote instability, whereby interchromosomal events at heterozygous sites offer extra opportunities for mutations to occur (heterozygote instability model). To examine which of these hypotheses is most likely, we compared ascertainment bias and species length differences between humans and chimpanzees in autosomal and Y chromosomal microsatellites. We find that levels of ascertainment bias are indistinguishable, but that interspecies length differences are significantly greater for autosomal loci compared with haploid Y chromosomal loci. Such a pattern is consistent with predictions from the heterozygote instability model and is not expected under models of microsatellite evolution that do not include interchromosomal events such as the enzyme evolution model.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A.-L. Raquin, F. Depaulis, A. Lambert, N. Galic, P. Brabant, and I. Goldringer Experimental Estimation of Mutation Rates in a Wheat Population With a Gene Genealogy Approach Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2195 - 2211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
