| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Genetics, Vol. 173, 2033-2038, August 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.106.059436
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, 425G Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706.
E-mail: wrengels{at}facstaff.wisc.edu
11 kb can be repaired with approximately the same efficiency as breaks with no gap at all. However, a gap of 44 kb was repaired only rarely, and one of 210 kb was not repaired at a measurable frequency. We conclude that DNA gap repair is a length-limited process, but that this limitation is critical only for gaps >>11 kb. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. McVey, S. L. Andersen, Y. Broze, and J. Sekelsky Multiple Functions of Drosophila BLM Helicase in Maintenance of Genome Stability Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 1979 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takeuchi, O. Georgiev, M. Fetchko, M. Kappeler, W. Schaffner, and D. Egli In Vivo Construction of Transgenes in Drosophila Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 2019 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Johnson-Schlitz and W. R. Engels Template disruptions and failure of double Holliday junction dissolution during double-strand break repair in Drosophila BLM mutants PNAS, November 7, 2006; 103(45): 16840 - 16845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |