- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.050179v1
172/4/2647 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Stephan, W.
- Articles by Langley, C. H.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Stephan, W.
- Articles by Langley, C. H.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on February 1, 2006.
Genetics, Vol. 172, 2647-2663, April 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.050179
The Hitchhiking Effect on Linkage Disequilibrium Between Linked Neutral Loci
Wolfgang Stephan*,1,
Yun S. Song
and
Charles H. Langley
* Section of Evolutionary Biology, Biocenter, University of Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany and
Department of Computer Sciences and
Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
1 Corresponding author: University of Munich, Grosshaderner Strasse 2, 82152 Planegg, Germany.
E-mail: stephan{at}zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de
We analyzed a three-locus model of genetic hitchhiking with one locus experiencing positive directional selection and two partially linked neutral loci. Following the original hitchhiking approach by Maynard Smith and Haigh, our analysis is purely deterministic. In the first half of the selected phase after a favored mutation has entered the population, hitchhiking may lead to a strong increase of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the two neutral sites if both are <0.1s away from the selected site (where s is the selection coefficient). In the second half of the selected phase, the main effect of hitchhiking is to destroy LD. This occurs very quickly (before the end of the selected phase) when the selected site is between both neutral loci. This pattern cannot be attributed to the well-known variation-reducing effect of hitchhiking but is a consequence of secondary hitchhiking effects on the recombinants created in the selected phase. When the selected site is outside the neutral loci (which are, say, <0.1s apart), however, a fast decay of LD is observed only if the selected site is in the immediate neighborhood of one of the neutral sites (i.e., if the recombination rate r between the selected site and one of the neutral sites satisfies
). If the selected site is far away from the neutral sites (say, r > 0.3s), the decay rate of LD approaches that of neutrality. Averaging over a uniform distribution of initial gamete frequencies shows that the expected LD at the end of the hitchhiking phase is driven toward zero, while the variance is increased when the selected site is well outside the two neutral sites. When the direction of LD is polarized with respect to the more common allele at each neutral site, hitchhiking creates more positive than negative linkage disequilibrium. Thus, hitchhiking may have a distinctively patterned LD-reducing effect, in particular near the target of selection.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Svetec, P. Pavlidis, and W. Stephan Recent Strong Positive Selection on Drosophila melanogaster HDAC6, a Gene Encoding a Stress Surveillance Factor, as Revealed by Population Genomic Analysis Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1549 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boitard, C. Schlotterer, and A. Futschik Detecting Selective Sweeps: A New Approach Based on Hidden Markov Models Genetics, April 1, 2009; 181(4): 1567 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-M. Chevin and F. Hospital Selective Sweep at a Quantitative Trait Locus in the Presence of Background Genetic Variation Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1645 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-M. Chevin, S. Billiard, and F. Hospital Hitchhiking Both Ways: Effect of Two Interfering Selective Sweeps on Linked Neutral Variation Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 301 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zivkovic and T. Wiehe Second-Order Moments of Segregating Sites Under Variable Population Size Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 341 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pfaffelhuber, A. Lehnert, and W. Stephan Linkage Disequilibrium Under Genetic Hitchhiking in Finite Populations Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 527 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Beisswanger and W. Stephan Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5447 - 5452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bullaughey, M. Przeworski, and G. Coop No effect of recombination on the efficacy of natural selection in primates Genome Res., April 1, 2008; 18(4): 544 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Jensen, V. L. Bauer DuMont, A. B. Ashmore, A. Gutierrez, and C. F. Aquadro Patterns of Sequence Variability and Divergence at the diminutive Gene Region of Drosophila melanogaster: Complex Patterns Suggest an Ancestral Selective Sweep Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1071 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hutter, H. Li, S. Beisswanger, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Distinctly Different Sex Ratios in African and European Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Inferred From Chromosomewide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 469 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Jensen, K. R. Thornton, C. D. Bustamante, and C. F. Aquadro On the Utility of Linkage Disequilibrium as a Statistic for Identifying Targets of Positive Selection in Nonequilibrium Populations Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2371 - 2379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zeng, S. Shi, and C.-I Wu Compound Tests for the Detection of Hitchhiking Under Positive Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1898 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zeng, S. Mano, S. Shi, and C.-I Wu Comparisons of Site- and Haplotype-Frequency Methods for Detecting Positive Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2007; 24(7): 1562 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. McVean The Structure of Linkage Disequilibrium Around a Selective Sweep Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1395 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Loewe and B. Charlesworth Background Selection in Single Genes May Explain Patterns of Codon Bias Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1381 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. J. Clark, S. E. Ptak, I. Tiemann, Y. Qian, G. Coop, A. C. Stone, M. Przeworski, N. Arnheim, and A. D. Rienzo Combining Sperm Typing and Linkage Disequilibrium Analyses Reveals Differences in Selective Pressures or Recombination Rates Across Human Populations Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 795 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pfaffelhuber, B. Haubold, and A. Wakolbinger Approximate Genealogies Under Genetic Hitchhiking Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 1995 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Glinka, D. De Lorenzo, and W. Stephan Evidence of Gene Conversion Associated with a Selective Sweep in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1869 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



