Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on February 19, 2006.

Genetics, Vol. 172, 2093-2100, April 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.052373

Clonal Interference and the Periodic Selection of New Beneficial Mutations in Escherichia coli

* Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands and {dagger} Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322

1 Corresponding author: Laboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands.
E-mail: arjan.devisser{at}wur.nl

The conventional model of adaptation in asexual populations implies sequential fixation of new beneficial mutations via rare selective sweeps that purge all variation and preserve the clonal genotype. However, in large populations multiple beneficial mutations may co-occur, causing competition among them, a phenomenon called "clonal interference." Clonal interference is thus expected to lead to longer fixation times and larger fitness effects of mutations that ultimately become fixed, as well as to a genetically more diverse population. Here, we study the significance of clonal interference in populations consisting of mixtures of differently marked wild-type and mutator strains of Escherichia coli that adapt to a minimal-glucose environment for 400 generations. We monitored marker frequencies during evolution and measured the competitive fitness of random clones from each marker state after evolution. The results demonstrate the presence of multiple beneficial mutations in these populations and slower and more erratic invasion of mutants than expected by the conventional model, showing the signature of clonal interference. We found that a consequence of clonal interference is that fitness estimates derived from invasion trajectories were less than half the magnitude of direct estimates from competition experiments, thus revealing fundamental problems with this fitness measure. These results force a reevaluation of the conventional model of periodic selection for asexual microbes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
L. De Gelder, J. J. Williams, J. M. Ponciano, M. Sota, and E. M. Top
Adaptive Plasmid Evolution Results in Host-Range Expansion of a Broad-Host-Range Plasmid
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2179 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S.-C. Park and J. Krug
Clonal interference in large populations
PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 18135 - 18140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. T. Witten, C. T. L. Chen, and B. A. Cohen
Complex Genetic Changes in Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Derived by Selection in the Laboratory
Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 449 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. D. H. Barrett, L. K. M'Gonigle, and S. P. Otto
The Distribution of Beneficial Mutant Effects Under Strong Selection
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2071 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]