- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.050138v1
172/2/1055 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Preston, C. R.
- Articles by Engels, W. R.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Preston, C. R.
- Articles by Engels, W. R.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on November 19, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 172, 1055-1068, February 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.050138
Differential Usage of Alternative Pathways of Double-Strand Break Repair in Drosophila
Christine R. Preston, Carlos C. Flores and William R. Engels1
Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
1 Corresponding author: Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, 425G Henry Mall, Madison, WI 53706.
E-mail: wrengels{at}facstaff.wisc.edu
Double-strand DNA breaks can be repaired by any of several alternative mechanisms that differ greatly in the nature of the final repaired products. We used a reporter construct, designated "Repair reporter 3" (Rr3), to measure the relative usage of these pathways in Drosophila germ cells. The method works by creating a double-strand break at a specific location such that expression of the red fluorescent protein, DsRed, in the next generation can be used to infer the frequency at which each pathway was used. A key feature of this approach is that most data come from phenotypic scoring, thus allowing large sample sizes and considerable precision in measurements. Specifically, we measured the proportion of breaks repaired by (1) conversion repair, (2) nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), or (3) single-strand annealing (SSA). For conversion repair, the frequency of mitotic crossing over in the germ line indicates the relative prevalence of repair by double Holliday junction (DHJ) formation vs. the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) pathway. We used this method to show that breaks occurring early in germ-line development were much more frequently repaired via single-strand annealing and much less likely to be repaired by end joining compared with identical breaks occurring later in development. Conversion repair was relatively rare when breaks were made either very early or very late in development, but was much more frequent in between. Significantly, the changes in relative usage occurred in a compensatory fashion, such that an increase in one pathway was accompanied by decreases in others. This negative correlation is interpreted to mean that the pathways for double-strand break repair compete with each other to handle a given breakage event.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Witsell, D. P. Kane, S. Rubin, and M. McVey Removal of the Bloom Syndrome DNA Helicase Extends the Utility of Imprecise Transposon Excision for Making Null Mutations in Drosophila Genetics, November 1, 2009; 183(3): 1187 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bozas, K. J. Beumer, J. K. Trautman, and D. Carroll Genetic Analysis of Zinc-Finger Nuclease-Induced Gene Targeting in Drosophila Genetics, July 1, 2009; 182(3): 641 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Deredec, A. Burt, and H. C. J. Godfray The Population Genetics of Using Homing Endonuclease Genes in Vector and Pest Management Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2013 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sudi, S. Zhang, G. Intrieri, X. Hao, and P. Zhang Coincidence of P-Insertion Sites and Breakpoints of Deletions Induced by Activating P Elements in Drosophila Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Chen, C. N. Hales, and S. E. Ozanne DNA damage, cellular senescence and organismal ageing: causal or correlative? Nucleic Acids Res., December 3, 2007; 35(22): 7417 - 7428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Wei and Y. S. Rong A Genetic Screen For DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mutations in Drosophila Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 63 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Shedge, M. Arrieta-Montiel, A. C. Christensen, and S. A. Mackenzie Plant Mitochondrial Recombination Surveillance Requires Unusual RecA and MutS Homologs PLANT CELL, April 1, 2007; 19(4): 1251 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Moehle, J. M. Rock, Y.-L. Lee, Y. Jouvenot, R. C. DeKelver, P. D. Gregory, F. D. Urnov, and M. C. Holmes Targeted gene addition into a specified location in the human genome using designed zinc finger nucleases PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3055 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Johnson-Schlitz and W. R. Engels Template disruptions and failure of double Holliday junction dissolution during double-strand break repair in Drosophila BLM mutants PNAS, November 7, 2006; 103(45): 16840 - 16845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Johnson-Schlitz and W. R. Engels The Effect of Gap Length on Double-Strand Break Repair in Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2033 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




