- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Data Supplement
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.046441v1
172/1/53 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Daniel, J. A.
- Articles by Burke, D. J.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Daniel, J. A.
- Articles by Burke, D. J.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 12, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 172, 53-65, January 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.046441
Diverse Functions of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Jewel A. Daniel, Brice E. Keyes, Yvonne P. Y. Ng, C. Onyi Freeman and Daniel J. Burke1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
1 Corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Medical Center, 1300 Jefferson Park Ave., Box 800733, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
E-mail: dburke{at}virginia.edu
The spindle assembly checkpoint regulates the metaphase-to-anaphase transition from yeast to humans. We examined the genetic interactions with four spindle assembly checkpoint genes to identify nonessential genes involved in chromosome segregation, to identify the individual roles of the spindle assembly checkpoint genes within the checkpoint, and to reveal potential complexity that may exist. We used synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis using spindle assembly checkpoint mutants mad1, mad2, mad3, and bub3. We found 228 synthetic interactions with the four spindle assembly checkpoint mutants with substantial overlap in the spectrum of interactions between mad1, mad2, and bub3. In contrast, there were many synthetic interactions that were common to mad1, mad2, and bub3 that were not shared by mad3. We found shared interactions between pairs of spindle assembly checkpoint mutants, suggesting additional complexity within the checkpoint and unique interactions for all of the spindle assembly checkpoint genes. We show that most genes in the interaction network, including ones with unique interactions, affect chromosome transmission or microtubule function, suggesting that the complexity of interactions reflects diverse roles for the checkpoint genes within the checkpoint. Our analysis expands our understanding of the spindle assembly checkpoint and identifies new candidate genes with possible roles in chromosome transmission and mitotic spindle function.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. Ikui and F. R. Cross Specific Genetic Interactions Between Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Proteins and B-Type Cyclins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, September 1, 2009; 183(1): 51 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Strome, X. Wu, M. Kimmel, and S. E. Plon Heterozygous Screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Identifies Dosage-Sensitive Genes That Affect Chromosome Stability Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1193 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tarailo, S. Tarailo, and A. M. Rose Synthetic Lethal Interactions Identify Phenotypic "Interologs" of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Components Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2525 - 2530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ma, J. McQueen, L. Cuschieri, J. Vogel, and V. Measday Spc24 and Stu2 Promote Spindle Integrity When DNA Replication Is Stalled Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2805 - 2816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. E. Anderson, J. Prudden, S. Prochnik, T. H. Giddings Jr., and K. G. Hardwick Novel sfi1 Alleles Uncover Additional Functions for Sfi1p in Bipolar Spindle Assembly and Function Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2007; 18(6): 2047 - 2056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Reis and J. L. Campbell Contribution of Trf4/5 and the Nuclear Exosome to Genome Stability Through Regulation of Histone mRNA Levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 993 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pramila, W. Wu, S. Miles, W. S. Noble, and L. L. Breeden The Forkhead transcription factor Hcm1 regulates chromosome segregation genes and fills the S-phase gap in the transcriptional circuitry of the cell cycle. Genes & Dev., August 15, 2006; 20(16): 2266 - 2278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Keogh, T. A. Mennella, C. Sawa, S. Berthelet, N. J. Krogan, A. Wolek, V. Podolny, L. R. Carpenter, J. F. Greenblatt, K. Baetz, et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4. Genes & Dev., March 15, 2006; 20(6): 660 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



