- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.104.036806v1
172/1/305 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Boschi, M.
- Articles by Robbins, L. G.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Boschi, M.
- Articles by Robbins, L. G.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on October 11, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 172, 305-316, January 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.104.036806
Genetic Evidence That Nonhomologous Disjunction and Meiotic Drive Are Properties of Wild-Type Drosophila melanogaster Male Meiosis
Manuela Boschi, Massimo Belloni and Leonard G. Robbins1
Dipartimento di Biologia Evolutiva, Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
1 Corresponding author: Dipartimento di Biologia Evolutiva, Università di Siena, Via Aldo Moro 2, 53100 Siena, Italy.
E-mail: robbins{at}unisi.it
We have followed sex and second chromosome disjunction, and the effects of these chromosomes on sperm function, in four genotypes: wild-type males, males deficient for the Y-linked crystal locus, males with an X chromosome heterochromatic deficiency that deletes all X–Y pairing sites, and males with both deficiencies. Both mutant situations provoke chromosome misbehavior, but the disjunctional defects are quite different. Deficiency of the X heterochromatin, consonant with the lack of pairing sites, mostly disrupts X–Y disjunction with a decidedly second-level effect on major autosome behavior. Deleting crystal, consonant with the cytological picture of postpairing chromatin-condensation problems, disrupts sex and autosome disjunction equally. Even when the mutant-induced nondisjunction has very different mechanics, however, and even more importantly, even in the wild type, there is strong, and similar, meiotic drive. The presence of meiotic drive when disjunction is disrupted by distinctly different mechanisms supports the notion that drive is a normal cellular response to meiotic problems rather than a direct effect of particular mutants. Most surprisingly, in both wild-type and crystal-deficient males the Y chromosome moves to the opposite pole from a pair of nondisjoined second chromosomes nearly 100% of the time. This nonhomologous interaction is, however, absent when the X heterochromatin is deleted. The nonhomologous disjunction of the sex and second chromosomes may be the genetic consequence of the chromosomal compartmentalization seen by deconvolution microscopy, and the absence of Y–2 disjunction when the X heterochromatin is deleted suggests that XY pairing itself, or a previously unrecognized heterochromatic function, is prerequisite to this macrostructural organization of the chromosomes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. S. Klenov, S. A. Lavrov, A. D. Stolyarenko, S. S. Ryazansky, A. A. Aravin, T. Tuschl, and V. A. Gvozdev Repeat-associated siRNAs cause chromatin silencing of retrotransposons in the Drosophila melanogaster germline Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2007; (2007) gkm576v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|