- THIS ARTICLE
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
genetics.105.046524v1
172/1/221 most recent - Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- SERVICES
- Email this article to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Alert me to new issues of the journal
- Download to citation manager
- Reprints & Permissions
- CITING ARTICLES
- Citing Articles via HighWire
- Citing Articles via Google Scholar
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- Articles by Galtier, N.
- Articles by Bierne, N.
- Search for Related Content
- PUBMED
- PubMed Citation
- Articles by Galtier, N.
- Articles by Bierne, N.
Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 12, 2005.
Genetics, Vol. 172, 221-228, January 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.046524
GC-Biased Segregation of Noncoding Polymorphisms in Drosophila
Nicolas Galtier1, Eric Bazin and Nicolas Bierne
UMR 5171, "Génome, Populations, Interactions, Adaptation," CNRS, Université Montpellier 2, IFREMER, 34095 Montpellier, France
1 Corresponding author: CNRS UMR 5171"Génome, Populations, Interactions, Adaptation," Université Montpellier 2, CC 063, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France.
E-mail: galtier{at}univ-montp2.fr
The study of base composition evolution in Drosophila has been achieved mostly through the analysis of coding sequences. Third codon position GC content, however, is influenced by both neutral forces (e.g., mutation bias) and natural selection for codon usage optimization. In this article, large data sets of noncoding DNA sequence polymorphism in D. melanogaster and D. simulans were gathered from public databases to try to disentangle these two factorsnoncoding sequences are not affected by selection for codon usage. Allele frequency analyses revealed an asymmetric pattern of AT vs. GC noncoding polymorphisms: AT
GC mutations are less numerous, and tend to segregate at a higher frequency, than GC
AT ones, especially at GC-rich loci. This is indicative of nonstationary evolution of base composition and/or of GC-biased allele transmission. Fitting population genetics models to the allele frequency spectra confirmed this result and favored the hypothesis of a biased transmission. These results, together with previous reports, suggest that GC-biased gene conversion has influenced base composition evolution in Drosophila and explain the correlation between intron and exon GC content.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. D. Singh, P. F. Arndt, A. G. Clark, and C. F. Aquadro Strong Evidence for Lineage and Sequence Specificity of Substitution Rates and Patterns in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1591 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Bauer DuMont, N. D. Singh, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro Locus-Specific Decoupling of Base Composition Evolution at Synonymous Sites and Introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia Lineages Gen Biol Evol, June 22, 2009; 2009(0): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Desai and J. B. Plotkin The Polymorphism Frequency Spectrum of Finitely Many Sites Under Selection Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 2175 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R Haddrill and B. Charlesworth Non-neutral processes drive the nucleotide composition of non-coding sequences in Drosophila Biol Lett, August 23, 2008; 4(4): 438 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Cutter Multilocus Patterns of Polymorphism and Selection Across the X Chromosome of Caenorhabditis remanei Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1661 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bartolome and B. Charlesworth Evolution of Amino-Acid Sequences and Codon Usage on the Drosophila miranda Neo-Sex Chromosomes Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2033 - 2044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



