Originally published as Genetics Published Articles Ahead of Print on September 12, 2005.

Genetics, Vol. 172, 221-228, January 2006, Copyright © 2006
doi:10.1534/genetics.105.046524

GC-Biased Segregation of Noncoding Polymorphisms in Drosophila

UMR 5171, "Génome, Populations, Interactions, Adaptation," CNRS, Université Montpellier 2, IFREMER, 34095 Montpellier, France

1 Corresponding author: CNRS UMR 5171—"Génome, Populations, Interactions, Adaptation," Université Montpellier 2, CC 063, Place E. Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France.
E-mail: galtier{at}univ-montp2.fr

The study of base composition evolution in Drosophila has been achieved mostly through the analysis of coding sequences. Third codon position GC content, however, is influenced by both neutral forces (e.g., mutation bias) and natural selection for codon usage optimization. In this article, large data sets of noncoding DNA sequence polymorphism in D. melanogaster and D. simulans were gathered from public databases to try to disentangle these two factors—noncoding sequences are not affected by selection for codon usage. Allele frequency analyses revealed an asymmetric pattern of AT vs. GC noncoding polymorphisms: AT -> GC mutations are less numerous, and tend to segregate at a higher frequency, than GC -> AT ones, especially at GC-rich loci. This is indicative of nonstationary evolution of base composition and/or of GC-biased allele transmission. Fitting population genetics models to the allele frequency spectra confirmed this result and favored the hypothesis of a biased transmission. These results, together with previous reports, suggest that GC-biased gene conversion has influenced base composition evolution in Drosophila and explain the correlation between intron and exon GC content.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, P. F. Arndt, A. G. Clark, and C. F. Aquadro
Strong Evidence for Lineage and Sequence Specificity of Substitution Rates and Patterns in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1591 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Gen Biol EvolHome page
V. L. Bauer DuMont, N. D. Singh, M. H. Wright, and C. F. Aquadro
Locus-Specific Decoupling of Base Composition Evolution at Synonymous Sites and Introns along the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila sechellia Lineages
Gen Biol Evol, June 22, 2009; 2009(0): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. M. Desai and J. B. Plotkin
The Polymorphism Frequency Spectrum of Finitely Many Sites Under Selection
Genetics, December 1, 2008; 180(4): 2175 - 2191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
P. R Haddrill and B. Charlesworth
Non-neutral processes drive the nucleotide composition of non-coding sequences in Drosophila
Biol Lett, August 23, 2008; 4(4): 438 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. D. Cutter
Multilocus Patterns of Polymorphism and Selection Across the X Chromosome of Caenorhabditis remanei
Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1661 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman
Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Bartolome and B. Charlesworth
Evolution of Amino-Acid Sequences and Codon Usage on the Drosophila miranda Neo-Sex Chromosomes
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2033 - 2044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. C. Presgraves
Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins
Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]